From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23288: 25.0.92; Clicking on links inserts primary X selection Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 22:42:21 -0700 Message-ID: References: <83mvnxau5t.fsf@gnu.org> <83futobsw1.fsf@gnu.org> <837ff0b931.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1463078814 10438 80.91.229.3 (12 May 2016 18:46:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 18:46:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, 23288@debbugs.gnu.org, nilsb@google.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 12 20:46:43 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b0vdA-0000th-Mg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 20:46:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59345 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0vd9-0001iN-W1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 14:46:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59496) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0vcf-0000mq-DQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 14:46:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0vcZ-0008KD-Ae for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 14:46:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36968) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0vcZ-0008K9-88 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 14:46:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b0vcZ-0007eK-3y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 14:46:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: John Wiegley Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 18:46:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23288 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 23288-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23288.146307874629351 (code B ref 23288); Thu, 12 May 2016 18:46:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23288) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2016 18:45:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49301 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b0vcI-0007dF-4f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 14:45:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.220.42]:33150) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b0vcD-0007ce-By for 23288@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 14:45:44 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id xk12so32307624pac.0 for <23288@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 12 May 2016 11:45:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=2H+KSqBQVxMzjk9ozVIUuvIeYWftRUs9OLnoI+4D3qA=; b=ZrNMNRiqASpdQ+ofHLnAtAjearP5p20aXnaB6CrurUdCQql6FqjV+bucNXY9+1tpxH xQeeQKF/wnSDlLe5khH722zLvRuZjT4uUZPRnwyb3wTmIB/kp/2tgdoRVp8NLoZEPC+G DA72vcWwFXPWcV6Q85yqWSSfQXAzcx6Oh63PeTgw0J21ORW3ts19UAk/Zf5oTeatjGEq lNo85GdS9sNbvkBO6itn0NTv2PcOtpdTlqaa9bcSPTchFDeknLck8BVJxGiwSRhPkaBs 47WEczp2v3NgZ1fYELCiH4tranEhEcAfvTYdTyE+AunLs/fcTkqbIAF6/1ZNskjZdz7q FddQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=2H+KSqBQVxMzjk9ozVIUuvIeYWftRUs9OLnoI+4D3qA=; b=gGKVJ7VRmzKbhbA3T/m+XzKSHQxwQYmuKvjyEJh0DVo6blqK3L+Xlpb3TERPpxm6t0 zgpMvFfYh5MK1/Jehm4MsDd8kpydQSvnkFBLkdwCp8xZ+8YvaTeIft15h14GVjdhXqM5 fIK9emv73ODEGfKh0dx8n/962sc52yI2bZPLi2bisQENb/MJVp/egCkOJNOXEb67MdXp zAsJsE969hGFcDgPCM3ariDYSIQGZdEOas7pufynw9e2mGWpyvSYXX1F+U9vqiK79Ru8 sKUCQ0KYNKL1yVLLrYGyarFR3cUtfp5o6kTKAV6GetnFjMOWjN1Aj5KW86a0Hs6yrXKx VW/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUK+EE39Sz8T0IuSb6kOeBE/SsipntZ8Rc3I5qCoqofC2iBl/GSUlyoZaTc3YVCJg== X-Received: by 10.66.55.101 with SMTP id r5mr16330890pap.146.1463078735345; Thu, 12 May 2016 11:45:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 71sm21580247pfy.32.2016.05.12.11.45.29 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 12 May 2016 11:45:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: John Wiegley Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 260124B60A6; Wed, 11 May 2016 22:42:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <837ff0b931.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 12 May 2016 00:04:02 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.93 (darwin) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:118178 Archived-At: >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> (See also merged #22434. Marked as release blocking for 3+ months.) > Sorry, I don't see the list of blocking bugs being treated seriously. If we > did treat it seriously, we wouldn't have had "deep freeze" on emacs-25, and > wouldn't be planning the release in less than a month. I'm not sure how those two things follow from not treating the blocking list seriously, Eli. Can you please explain? As far as I understand it, others will treat it as seriously as we do. As it stands right now, I think many of the bugs on that list do not deserve to be there, so it's a matter of priority setting. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2