From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Pankaj Jangid Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45605: [macos] could not load dump file - more info Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2021 20:11:35 +0530 Message-ID: References: <8335zjg3yl.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32530"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (darwin) Cc: 45605@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 02 15:42:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kvi6f-0008Mz-4f for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 15:42:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42586 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kvi6e-000543-7Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 09:42:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40104) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kvi6T-0004yQ-UO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 09:42:01 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48041) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kvi6T-0003yO-Lm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 09:42:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kvi6T-0000RI-Jo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 09:42:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Pankaj Jangid Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2021 14:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45605 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45605-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45605.16095985121675 (code B ref 45605); Sat, 02 Jan 2021 14:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45605) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2021 14:41:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59587 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kvi6J-0000Qw-SW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 09:41:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-f51.google.com ([209.85.216.51]:50732) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kvi6H-0000Qi-Cb for 45605@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 09:41:50 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-f51.google.com with SMTP id lj6so7251671pjb.0 for <45605@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 06:41:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codeisgreat-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QBGC4yCyUK2gnLLHJQtlTN08XAO7Kv+wor6+YsZpUuM=; b=aLPpJv0gPlHKU07oGJ+o2cttjUeoRUBJVBJCgzSQVJ4xAC0WYAUXO2FfLGuTWnSLt2 EBevuc6rSohmO/2onkzrl32z/zjxUyIUqnugNNt+3kC2v5Jdd5CeBsXfX9Q2i924IJDf Ny4LhSZQGeE+/ySMvEeuKXhvNVZhj2jyYGUD7aqDKBcOYv5hJAnq9ygo6JZMh8MGW+aq ekhWcxWm9JLLEziW2ZJg04ArQbRYVEjlSuI/1xl0ml/LhBrPaz1f2vDa5xoPMLPesiiH 2GU1wsipJApoMJ117JNN6jKpE9p8EtDd+aKdb/nsye7IWp7mErri0pbJiSDcdDEwhUAC zidQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QBGC4yCyUK2gnLLHJQtlTN08XAO7Kv+wor6+YsZpUuM=; b=n04nvZosQg27gR6aab7vHNTYhy2cYXCbLQQy4B080vKt3tf84+f9pGG5oUAroQdXOT 2p8oNnMOquCxJl81U+SO7TW4NV9atvnfRs2Ndkvp8L5NOIBAp0QfGqmSv2plTBuJ35+T emUJr9NrfN/zxqdol4URPEHD21zmZy80SGtgSqJs34KTizmRr2JeMK4I/QpBSxa4eiPB CF6v1iaFtWShXfzBR8L/6U5d/JqiASXfo+U9ZNS0WpRBJ8LizKwnFKVyUoERoXr7fQ13 7Ss6cFZsiSoXsHRra2bdMMIel0bhzy/PZvOFq5bTFf1vSS5cTXGkPuDQOYO4l9Uqcauf hlwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532x3iXf0TLNcRxTLKJy56Tq9ClL7gk3BVCqhw1UCDEXkzLA+bd1 BE02fncIGqB01/AcEV0dteuSkNB9WO/yAQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw2C/Wu0G2lBKQ44GYz/RfwKi5m6KufHBjAAZQf3zEdw9RMu8tIVpl9ZvGvWObUKYtVZONUog== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c411:b029:da:a2fc:4143 with SMTP id k17-20020a170902c411b02900daa2fc4143mr65366521plk.19.1609598503158; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 06:41:43 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from mb2.local ([2405:201:5c06:70bb:9d13:6a9b:bc55:8e8c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c10sm16242851pjn.22.2021.01.02.06.41.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 02 Jan 2021 06:41:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8335zjg3yl.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 02 Jan 2021 10:04:02 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:197191 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Pankaj Jangid >> Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2021 13:06:02 +0530 >>=20 >> I think other people are also facing same issue. There is one email in >> help-gnu-emacs list. > > Hearing the same complaint from other people without any significant > new details doesn't help in investigating the problem. If you have > the impression that we somehow dismiss the problem because you are the > only one reporting it, that impression is wrong. I am really sorry if my language gave an impression of complaint. Really sorry about that. I was trying to tell if those other emails have any clue. > So let's please keep looking into the problem on your system and try > to find out the reasons, okay? Don't worry about the others reporting > the same, we also read those reports and won't miss when they say > something important. Luckily I have kept that terminal open and copied the build log. As I am inspecting it, I see that the configure script was run multiple times. Is this normal? I haven=E2=80=99t noticed this before today. There are no other errors in the build. Just in the end. That I shared earlier in this thread. BTW, is the build log automatically saved somewhere. Did I make unnecessary effort to copy from the terminal. :-)