From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40248: 27.0.90; Failure open .authinfo.gpg from Gnus Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:10:34 +0200 Message-ID: References: <86bloi1zrj.fsf@csic.es> <83lfnm8b30.fsf@gnu.org> <83ftdt9b1d.fsf@gnu.org> <86sght3h1s.fsf@csic.es> <834ku89anf.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhbzsis4.fsf@gnus.org> <83h7y75kvh.fsf@gnu.org> <83bloe3s5k.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="47552"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: juanjose.garcia.ripoll@csic.es, larsi@gnus.org, 40248@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 30 16:11:18 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jIv8I-000CCb-Ds for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:11:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50426 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jIv8H-00050B-Ed for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:11:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54130) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jIv82-0004pC-T8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:11:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jIv81-00010M-RQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51534) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jIv81-000104-O5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:11:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jIv81-0003Dy-K4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:11:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 14:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40248 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40248-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40248.158557744912376 (code B ref 40248); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 14:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40248) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Mar 2020 14:10:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34847 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jIv7o-0003DY-QN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:10:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f49.google.com ([209.85.128.49]:39853) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jIv7j-0003DG-O2 for 40248@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:10:47 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f49.google.com with SMTP id e9so10152108wme.4 for <40248@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 07:10:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version; bh=J9m4qZhctdQQfsNWUR9J5AhDPuAvo94NuAuVz6uXFS4=; b=MF9b4puNGcoe0T5g+FBR0NPXvzLNnl0n5FFSQ0IRX8OUOREpePib++VbMpquuyJLnS 3vmUvc+bRtMR4OgfmhnJLYYNaefxyfsXEjxc5RR4SfJz1T/1+KvAMq74CeqG3r0qjTfy IWv5s3iPdN1X/X+2rzDQFZEV3diL8HMI3j0MRSXY3cdM9aQ5i6aZjJ6A6H10ymcobuEy rzdDvJjQ4xuUib63bALDa0a2KIP7oUPmLRpanXZZV3zLjnBgA92vTPdkBK3pjHKrmSqQ XF300c3CUSVMppsuReGrcGv03+oMwb5PzqN4Zd0SAnrUXOgODvmhIwILsYNiJMe53reD ZrLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version; bh=J9m4qZhctdQQfsNWUR9J5AhDPuAvo94NuAuVz6uXFS4=; b=sUBZcSGiKUbgGpgQUduNEjgv6FsL30MKQeVU5Ppa7eavfQclaHpNaBZY/XycQhIAxJ QePeYVoUxIkYjFNWrJ9oZb+XvkA0zbS6hbcik4xxDO/Jm+8CQ495Gqv2CoRk9scDZEuQ Rmi7WB3ZbwBM3kaOtNq+H4WJVcU7jyI//4yIChr+V8UXnLZP0RyfZDluN0S4fEv6lCzz qBnHmg3l2G7dWk2WGbKykrK3XN/aBf7Zsz2WOyEDuIYqXzokvVFbPD8at0ufM9OyAqrx YZRmEqp7q46YqlGK09M6qggAElOJKdAqoOnMVzs3eYYPNsHq6vufyO0c58aTWcZ05xV+ 1A9A== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3zlu66eRu19AQt5XMa65Ackap5tPEszo6SKvSO+mvc+ECOULgA Itolm6XOw2p4FQMB/Vhq9p6v0De7 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vulIdLm1fKyYjjL1Egf0KkOmh8e+YBOANuiOdY9CqhlPl33gKcIVPlFGkP3zlAwq8SNUsSG5Q== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c205:: with SMTP id x5mr9370515wmi.189.1585577436603; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 07:10:36 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rpluim-mac ([2a01:e34:ecfc:a860:65f2:9a92:2c96:9204]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j135sm1209962wmj.46.2020.03.30.07.10.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 30 Mar 2020 07:10:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83bloe3s5k.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:10:15 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:177868 Archived-At: >>>>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:10:15 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: Eli> If you can find those cases where you saw non-ASCII data in this case, Eli> by all means describe them or point to relevant discussions. >> >> My (admittedly fallible) memory is that gpg always uses UTF-8 for >> non-ASCII data (except for some old versions that %-escape it instead). Eli> Is that true even on MS-Windows? can someone please verify that? If Eli> gpg uses UTF-8 on all platforms, the 'undecided' isn't TRT, as in some Eli> cases Emacs could mistakenly decide the encoding is the current system Eli> codepage. We should use 'utf-8' instead if UTF-8 is guaranteed. Having now re-checked it, I was wrong. gpg uses UTF-8 consistenly _internally_, but converts to/from whatever it thinks the native codepage is (on MS-Windows and unixy platforms). Robert