From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#65908: 29.1.50; Emacs 29 regresses on macOS Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2023 18:36:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8875281f07b4d23d857c@heytings.org> <83o7hd4n5n.fsf@gnu.org> <83zg0x2gaf.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37798"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: ccsmile2008@outlook.com, alan@idiocy.org, 65908@debbugs.gnu.org, gregory@heytings.org, stefankangas@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 05 18:36:57 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qoRLN-0009b7-Aa for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2023 18:36:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qoRLE-00012K-AJ; Thu, 05 Oct 2023 12:36:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qoRLB-0000sN-0S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2023 12:36:45 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qoRL9-00011i-Lg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2023 12:36:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qoRLR-0005YO-UD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2023 12:37:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2023 16:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65908 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 65908-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65908.169652380621324 (code B ref 65908); Thu, 05 Oct 2023 16:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 65908) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Oct 2023 16:36:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48384 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qoRLB-0005Xr-Me for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2023 12:36:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-x529.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::529]:61752) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qoRL6-0005Xb-O3 for 65908@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2023 12:36:44 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-x529.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5363227cc80so1973924a12.3 for <65908@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 05 Oct 2023 09:36:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1696523777; x=1697128577; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=VZQvZOEM1A0xBzwA/LACPYVLs4j1bG2yf+93XT78MvA=; b=ZOPXRz7gECtuGMH9rGZlfZDRU3dhxYSMgmimgi1xCKyp3lVWI3g6bp1pfeJerTH1vL hvE3UW68I+AwQxp9xR9FftylHkF+pA5VYfkEfZ7Ji1ZduCm1UIgsO5DSvmU3EaZSlRtn b2QYiiIJsEkUiHlYHWM3lGTddeiZ78MGajpi8Q+mDy/CZp/ni5+9DIEteYe2wm+OpKTi uq7BMoCCxK/ncgRD384qoce6E2gaxZco3Zx8SErTM0+U7NBfWlUek54ejoDVLUkRDY+z np02iU6qMNPwNJ7M3Z+OnGqDPUqCf+ZzNfWvId5dm1UyZtCgNQhYV8Na5cYnvr5yEGs0 XyKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1696523777; x=1697128577; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VZQvZOEM1A0xBzwA/LACPYVLs4j1bG2yf+93XT78MvA=; b=SJ4oCiUpkYKGGKe/pIo9Yr2TvAdMUDx3BuogesAR3kuyCt+dUgdCXCKwj/dk2fP8tO Kt/JS1wn027PGEIGCndirh00q88p4tRruk95zl3Fh50s22czyMOPAYb/D5sbphZycCfO Fmo+GC1lkG3vsf2pHxX4KZpfnUV1JJFJy/k6qP3GrQnqVn0qJYKkl+iIOFsVJTJ72QO0 gG1B+YZj583ZiPRNlt2vf/6sPnKC+pOXkEV2GxwoJq669fZ8SdxZ8Df8j4Z1Hr7ev6JH IIXw6QsHqrEzg6+gChhIQsOanS52G8a/QNcMVuZ5IUiLCdyZlMz2goq3jjnl7qdNTpVA 1olw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzSVmwtAakPnQ6Z4teb6RdclRv+Gtx9XsjKy/qaQP0x5DWqcGkW KqZ8jEe+pNcs2ubBsY8wkYI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFPVfl6AI8ptaR+FF68eOG3d5x9wzR0HpcxoRFILS5VtlypyBR/vl94wDJcBZfQjMw+DysPtw== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d947:0:b0:531:9c1:8271 with SMTP id l7-20020aa7d947000000b0053109c18271mr5422865eds.14.1696523776515; Thu, 05 Oct 2023 09:36:16 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Pro.fritz.box (pd9e3618b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.227.97.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f26-20020a056402005a00b00530bc7cf377sm1301851edu.12.2023.10.05.09.36.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 05 Oct 2023 09:36:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83zg0x2gaf.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 05 Oct 2023 19:19:20 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:271894 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Gerd M=C3=B6llmann >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gregory@heytings.org, >> 65908@debbugs.gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, ccsmile2008@outlook.c= om >> Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2023 15:56:11 +0200 >>=20 >> To the question of profiling. I've now used the built-in profiler on >> the two commits, but I must say that I don't see where the difference >> comes from. These are debug builds, 5 runs of the benchmark. > > Are you sure you haven't profiled the same build? The profiles look > almost identical. Yes, I'm sure.