From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22220: 24.5; no documentation for default process sentinel Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:34:09 -0800 Message-ID: References: <837fk6queu.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3idq1db.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1450892123 14861 80.91.229.3 (23 Dec 2015 17:35:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:35:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ram Bhamidipaty , 22220@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 23 18:35:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aBnJe-0005hK-58 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 18:35:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57207 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aBnJd-0004FC-Gh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:35:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40331) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aBnJZ-0004EZ-Qn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:35:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aBnJW-00072V-L2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:35:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53553) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aBnJW-00072R-HT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:35:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aBnJW-0008P6-6h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:35:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: John Wiegley Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22220 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22220-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22220.145089206032245 (code B ref 22220); Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22220) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2015 17:34:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32922 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aBnIq-0008Nz-LZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:34:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:34530) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aBnIo-0008Nm-2c for 22220@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:34:18 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id uo6so31028801pac.1 for <22220@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:34:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=Iwc1K9uoUtvrWS/9gvfaCQoRyJyZsCuxZs+u/lrMGgs=; b=ePssGqhjl1K6eijTXX3yZs7zYAZlf5a5ooO/o84xXXW6t6N4jCItpcdPgBhwzt+Wtb Bwce//j4PqvAbcvmVSP+Wh+2FsPaPLpAc/V+EgOrxFdw6bvAT3jbGTP9ji2JtyBcCx52 7W1YUHuSP6ZTlfw3u2NxXPrv4vroC/PSZMq4gZ6p5z24QCXE8l9Ay3+FX/WayjduXkV8 g9oNjLNCEs1/MgmxOszoLSSZbaQwfvPV7EUc0jZNCN/IGMXkKPduPk7+DgDuzaHpOyUk lsshWhTrewVwmRyhMFeTwZMTAIi8UxI/aLND/KG+T6FCZuWGaEzAHIUV5W2OYz+XYks5 6VnA== X-Received: by 10.66.234.133 with SMTP id ue5mr45820944pac.56.1450892052345; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:34:12 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fe6sm53955468pab.40.2015.12.23.09.34.11 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:34:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id EA8D711AC3825; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:34:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83r3idq1db.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 23 Dec 2015 05:40:00 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:110311 Archived-At: >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> It would be nice if the default process sentinel were explicitly documented >> - at least the name and formal description. > As for the name, why is that important? You can always get it installed for > the process using nil as the argument to set-process-sentinel, and the > implementation is in C, so how would the name help? I must admit to a similar confusion. Aside from the fact that more could be said: does more need to be said? -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2