From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Gemini Lasswell Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24738: 26.0.50; Incorrect Edebug spec for seq-let Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 07:29:50 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87shrr5twp.fsf@petton.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1476976657 12855 195.159.176.226 (20 Oct 2016 15:17:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:17:37 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (darwin) To: Nicolas Petton , 24738@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 20 17:17:33 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bxF5s-0001X4-F4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:17:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55484 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bxF5u-0006qc-Af for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 11:17:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43887) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bxEMD-0007y6-Ds for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:30:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bxEM7-0004AR-3B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:30:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34578) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bxEM7-0004AH-0E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bxEM6-00042B-QR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:30:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gemini Lasswell Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24738 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24738-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24738.147697379915473 (code B ref 24738); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24738) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2016 14:29:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40768 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bxEM3-00041V-99 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:29:59 -0400 Original-Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:48890) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bxEM1-00041M-3k for 24738@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:29:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [10.9.9.211] (helo=mailfront11.runbox.com) by bars.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bxELz-0001b3-LW; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:29:55 +0200 Original-Received: from c-24-22-244-161.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ([24.22.244.161] helo=rainbow.local) by mailfront11.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:179284 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1bxELy-0002NA-2A; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:29:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87shrr5twp.fsf@petton.fr> (Nicolas Petton's message of "Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:03:34 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:124734 Archived-At: Nicolas Petton writes: >> Changing seq-let's edebug spec to (debug (sexp form body)) >> fixes this for me. > > Why sexp instead of form for the first argument? Because it doesn't get evaluated and shouldn't be instrumented.