From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#42366: UTF8 QR codes vs. emacs Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:57:04 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87pn8wx3k2.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <875z9xcrrk.fsf@gnus.org> <83a6z99nv3.fsf@gnu.org> <87wo2djhp2.fsf@gnus.org> <834kph9mja.fsf@gnu.org> <87mu39jg7r.fsf@gnus.org> <83zh79879h.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2mt85mp.fsf@gnu.org> <83wo2d85gs.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27468"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 42366@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 06 10:00:22 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k3ap3-00072g-0t for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 10:00:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43460 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3ap1-0000OR-Jl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 04:00:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60322) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3amo-00083g-3c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 03:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41517) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3amn-0004fq-QU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 03:58:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3amn-0006OT-QF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 03:58:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 07:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42366 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 42366-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42366.159670063524521 (code B ref 42366); Thu, 06 Aug 2020 07:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 42366) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2020 07:57:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53063 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3am3-0006NR-70 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 03:57:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f47.google.com ([209.85.221.47]:38225) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3am0-0006NB-Cx for 42366@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 03:57:13 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f47.google.com with SMTP id a14so43081590wra.5 for <42366@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 00:57:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0rJV263T2hz/WOfpGCbJvGe7jdWKhuO7Hj3Q2A6mShw=; b=EE9dzXOGNKjfRVpsZp5wPPfVyE9hJfeX6qYU8Lj9L43U4ATrs1RtPy9+dx6XxX6x8C ezy1e4U+Y52gQ3LMZPWQUJMWbFDDZdIniprEvxNaeiEUIFcOnij7bkCDs/W2+MCoFkiP Jt1+jszTJvQP+hF8OhD5t4Tb+eVTSxbMfr1kCtgDpdrJ4hMX1sUV1SbScj9RM4X93vsq hH/bp1GoHCKejNi3jPELv9ar9fncTv+DWsHbctcLmPNOL8bxwws7xfiNFad5bB/q/Jmu FnIoc3VFNfUVkeFoGY3xiFga/4GkUuk5m1/MUaOq96gZhcjHS67Xr61ShD3JezX6wueE Y1fw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0rJV263T2hz/WOfpGCbJvGe7jdWKhuO7Hj3Q2A6mShw=; b=oKAw9SHREr7Q0bxcVAKj8dpy/mecUM1eJX2mQmIFNjwrMfFvY6HXKVTJa7CSf4HI22 sb/MBcn2Z79Ky5ZHuf8u08nFV+AueNFQVIdG318VD0VJC7pVUEUL8PWF3mdwRUNfXAtp pY/yE02q8qaY3pLcLe1AuiiJfHma88FHLew30PVMuS1VVk5G3aNEkxFrTbvJM/DPQRtp RyMmmnLm0L6I9JSVOrUD8aL3rde5vtUdpkLzUdEh/aAqPgoi9O2Uhn4b7ZO2v//xACIm 1J0Ks222efX21nIKJPCPZzliqv5NlExNTD9VszYfumV3XygYgDrIVDrBMrFsOKZw8Vr0 xQpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532JRmtnlM0YRSuSH5EPP91+LQ8x3CEwytcl6BRpxnXu8arcXKIo pGDO5t/bDsjwPUvl9GOXHIc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw0i7AnVM87mq8bzR9GHcSVpQ+4+4NQHvn51ZUa+O4tHKvtFecR4LwOdfLmnrOsPJ3NXyTBUA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:a4d7:: with SMTP id h23mr6828379wrb.276.1596700626141; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 00:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rpluim-mac ([2a01:e34:ecfc:a860:d4b5:52d4:854b:9bd0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p6sm5712695wmg.0.2020.08.06.00.57.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 Aug 2020 00:57:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83wo2d85gs.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 05 Aug 2020 18:42:11 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:184160 Archived-At: >>>>> On Wed, 05 Aug 2020 18:42:11 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: >> Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 18:38:38 +0300 >> From: Eli Zaretskii >> Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 42366@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org >>=20 >> What exactly is surprising here? In a TTY frame, Emacs doesn't >> control the layout: the terminal emulator does. Emacs just sends >> codes to the terminal device, and that's it. Eli> To clarify: the original complaint, AFAIU, was about the display i= n a Eli> GUI frame, in which case the layout is entirely ours. You are now Eli> saying that the problem is on TTY frames, but there we don't contr= ol Eli> the layout at all. I don=CA=BCt think I said that. The TTY frame layout looks ok, the gui frame one has what looks like extra pixels between the characters. Robert