From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Helmut Eller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#65030: 30.0.50; Check keyword args of make-process Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2023 19:14:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83a5v5u9nf.fsf@gnu.org> <83o7jkrcme.fsf@gnu.org> <87sf8tapbf.fsf@gmail.com> <0E5BAD91-FE2A-4622-9F76-26E8CEB8F71A@acm.org> <83350tohjg.fsf@gnu.org> <87bkfhad0i.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15291"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Robert Pluim , 65030@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 08 19:16:12 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qTQJY-0003mb-1b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2023 19:16:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qTQJQ-0007D8-Ua; Tue, 08 Aug 2023 13:16:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qTQJO-00077n-Ka for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2023 13:16:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qTQJO-0005Ee-CG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2023 13:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qTQJN-0006gK-TE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2023 13:16:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Helmut Eller Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2023 17:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65030 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 65030-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65030.169151490725605 (code B ref 65030); Tue, 08 Aug 2023 17:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 65030) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Aug 2023 17:15:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37641 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qTQIU-0006ev-S9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2023 13:15:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x32b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32b]:50391) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qTQIS-0006e6-Ga for 65030@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2023 13:15:04 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3fe5c0e57d2so19649035e9.0 for <65030@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 08 Aug 2023 10:15:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1691514898; x=1692119698; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Q6kcUKG3UaPb59hVEStkjUmrAa4ePOa0bf1o0rgj6/A=; b=P7kHVeLr8pWGzV8N8HZKW29N67ZhmkP30HBUK4VIMje2CfBO4uEQlRngWzqkVslgQk U3JokDFoLauArsXYcdHB6vjptkeHJcDlwJ7YgQbLBltz3nupOPKllgeTYQextDjtCAgC uhId3yq61w1U07KKYDyDHzeWr8eh1qqKs8d9NItg6LJV9X3wwBOSK23PCGVvRzjsfrQu SQObx2LkIGf9EQ6xB0ZLmi8RXkqUdQTi2bl3UYJ7TeZYcTn+jJBfHy4R33fCQ1B/j2q1 iNVtaZ50PrNP+nl31OGN/NKfyXEeIO6p7DnCT2BPmEKCzt6ZXW7yiUsWosmIHU3PThpP 7Upg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691514898; x=1692119698; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Q6kcUKG3UaPb59hVEStkjUmrAa4ePOa0bf1o0rgj6/A=; b=Kl8drwAIu0gJi5ycgKTuOSIwAWunYSzlqFHTWxPQm2IBzX1lknflaQdryCtZACI0gu jr31QFem7Lk6dE8bXiiaFxmvQL9t6Xlu+TOZ7051ggD7W9V81ZSlCgp05sjISoEdHUQA i7VtXbphZBCSiyCHdT3IKaLQ68SAq1ZXpOv0BcvEEc3tbhtvRfr+ap+ursAnItZ6kpWk T0AANrqzs4qEzqwBLVs9jbWwgzvNrxVfIQvAEXn+0EdVf1AOCuoJbWbFqKQwZ35k3RmU pNve6ChSBXlozU82Q3xY3t/gLp3jMZ9ufSxzGZhW1HE1t1M60BhPdEPuPO95fb+V3lAt 4a/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwJoTYajNSZcU3ZssJ0pbbkE7CWkPYtHXz12SMQDidjwfl1ULZi TxBmzgVFrCs7q6xumkhDxh800lcjOis= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF0XcCYO3yGwGcZ4Im374wWijpTkCWuH33MCZvjSLfwOLV10EK0f5bb34OXnUaxdULPq5duPQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:294a:b0:3fb:fca1:1965 with SMTP id n10-20020a05600c294a00b003fbfca11965mr343090wmd.18.1691514898098; Tue, 08 Aug 2023 10:14:58 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from caladan (dialin-228086.xdsl.raiffeisen.net. [195.254.228.86]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c5-20020a05600c0ac500b003fc02218d6csm18642651wmr.25.2023.08.08.10.14.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 08 Aug 2023 10:14:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: ("Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?="'s message of "Tue, 8 Aug 2023 18:38:03 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:266975 Archived-At: On Tue, Aug 08 2023, Mattias Engdeg=C3=A5rd wrote: > Pushed to master: the warning patch (thank you!) and a modest :name > error improvement. This should make things a lot better than they used > to be. Thank you. > Are we done for now? Just a nitpick: (make-process) with 0 arguments doesn't signal a runtime error. The if (nargs =3D=3D 0) return Qnil; is now probably counterproductive. Helmut