From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#65344: 28.2; Unable to Edebug cl-flet form which uses argument destructuring Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 08:19:29 +0200 Message-ID: References: <5184DD53-F121-405D-AEE9-6E72E17127EA@gmail.com> <87lee1nsvn.fsf@web.de> <87cyzbkbi6.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14161"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: brandon.irizarry@gmail.com, Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= , Michael Albinus , 65344@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 25 08:20:18 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qZQB8-0003Rv-5K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 08:20:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZQAq-0007lO-Hi; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 02:20:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZQAo-0007kP-5U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 02:19:58 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZQAn-0000m0-R3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 02:19:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qZQAs-00036V-6A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 02:20:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 06:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65344 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 65344-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65344.169294438411892 (code B ref 65344); Fri, 25 Aug 2023 06:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 65344) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Aug 2023 06:19:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39019 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qZQAa-00035j-7k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 02:19:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::133]:48596) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qZQAY-00035W-17 for 65344@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2023 02:19:42 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-4ffae5bdc9aso827028e87.1 for <65344@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 23:19:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1692944371; x=1693549171; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=eQz3PkMEAlwOmHUQNl0WkITdl3pgs8Ec8Tmgjhh9v8c=; b=GqF/3+mps+z8Iy+DrNjdItQaNk5BPyMgk4DPqnHY+IwTOaPTwZmcPqhp0xm6e0Bjqr HElsH3AYCCrV+aGej68o0JiaVkbV0k+rCwftmTqFqNR8lFdkGaNp4r0lZIUKrB/cDhgw 7z872PZVn4xbRAg/q90S2+nfetsbCtntFyN8MpZBmyEdR/+Pu9l/aC65yoErNwyaEeLl TahxPrQN4rv4Q1D6kkQXsIowRlitYXaZ9SsZZC+6NGzvvgm0r+9wWc8OK6QsBCv2O2M5 bbjnWJ5sW5CZwwSpHQH2kxt0yTlS0VAYCdZIcyjVN6YhbfZoCOUT3m/kaGBJhoxUuCd2 7ccA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692944371; x=1693549171; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=eQz3PkMEAlwOmHUQNl0WkITdl3pgs8Ec8Tmgjhh9v8c=; b=lZg7y/I14ZAnU1w2Dg7Pdh244+i9O3o9wjOOgbYecMtJ7G6uReDSIf3M1t915Q+k/U FXdN+6ysG5QKoO0Rb5LCyR0rXQ7Q7Wiuyye3GgWhZwicHUPgfG6Wdz+ZAU4EXWywZpfT fCJnkq103HrVwLoYrqN61C/p0b0fuCe9kGNeIx+Hc6x8fUaogORpqVnjd5lUvAp4REhf EH8Tg2LduKZhVhzo5S3AyrlCYrIxbef7lrxAVP9UxRzn0WvZNSdYAybr29OAoadk9hRT 7JyvCrCmPWnCqPTEufFYHycIa6kefP4YcxR4axWBuerfe7SReQkd5RtlA44sNNUMukqi /+zQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxCQqIvaODuQsOF3DTuVbag+Il60OxouxRENl2ZFZFDSLf9AlUs GIfFW+dQesHOOU/PF995qXquHEcEZ+3Gdk/k X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHh8VXLQsrhpz48DLKUZTsfWnVCuQje5Z6DzdlAharCfFio35N3MSnDFNGrzBfyuOOZq7+wJg== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4e95:0:b0:500:7dcc:621 with SMTP id o21-20020ac24e95000000b005007dcc0621mr9075453lfr.31.1692944370955; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 23:19:30 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Mini.fritz.box (pd9e36a34.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.227.106.52]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v19-20020a170906339300b0099ba3438554sm581206eja.191.2023.08.24.23.19.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 24 Aug 2023 23:19:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87cyzbkbi6.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Fri, 25 Aug 2023 06:10:41 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:268391 Archived-At: Michael Heerdegen writes: > Gerd M=C3=B6llmann writes: > >> Difficult. >> >> One could of course try filtering out constructs that def-form doesn't >> like with a preceeding ¬, but that's such an effing solution that my >> arm hairs stand up. I don't think I'll do that. > > Looks like a bad design choice made very early in the development of > Edebug. Maybe the developers just didn't expect that this would be used > inside an &or alternative. The docs say Edebug specifications provide the power of regular expression matching, plus some context-free grammar constructs: I have a hard time imagining that somone with that spiration overlooks something like what we have here. I'll submit a new issue for this.