From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26952: 25.1; loops eating all memory while yanking big rectangle Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 22:31:37 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87zie8gyu4.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83h90fq269.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaovh1db.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <8360gvpfxr.fsf@gnu.org> <87shjzgwgk.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83y3tqnsab.fsf@gnu.org> <83lgpqng0i.fsf@gnu.org> <83inkto7yz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1495690271 28109 195.159.176.226 (25 May 2017 05:31:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 05:31:11 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.130016 (Ma Gnus v0.16) Emacs/25.2 (darwin) Cc: Paul Eggert , 26952@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 25 07:31:06 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dDlMY-0007A4-7G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 May 2017 07:31:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58270 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDlMd-0004lD-P6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 May 2017 01:31:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43633) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDlMX-0004l6-M5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 May 2017 01:31:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDlMU-0008Pc-JR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 May 2017 01:31:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34164) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDlMU-0008PY-99 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 May 2017 01:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dDlMU-0004o1-32 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 May 2017 01:31:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: John Wiegley Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 05:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26952 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 26952-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26952.149569024218443 (code B ref 26952); Thu, 25 May 2017 05:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26952) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 May 2017 05:30:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36841 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dDlMA-0004nO-5G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 May 2017 01:30:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-f178.google.com ([209.85.192.178]:36057) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dDlM8-0004nB-JF for 26952@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 May 2017 01:30:40 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-f178.google.com with SMTP id m17so156534674pfg.3 for <26952@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 22:30:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=KYNq4rHKzWRu4OZeE8eBWsFTrpfXacV3cjj73L71kYI=; b=XorOLa219jWUU86u1ZRoK6Z/0oIVSR8XFU1XOyLVBciO9F1NoZ1atCIr28mU8hBRhW PVFbja3Z9J1FsZ7+fDPQVnknKB5dOPC48JUrYY0pqzLKpJuUgA1JPChbuy7uzbDUkR0E TFEPb/EFpXsBpb+Fj3qt8odE1JhOMa4GbkeZlnPz1sXjIjpsfzdkwKgJ3QaZh1CzJMvt +4c+qbNyr+RVWCf0u19vkNDpq2G6um1sm0F8uiZMZ+VL6zcyCYx7FWvg72GGSjPXshPk ts9fJp1utkjCsh850AmgzTcF7R32G76UtonPseCVR/eXaRvmGOIP2ramrfBCLh4yBSqa cueA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=KYNq4rHKzWRu4OZeE8eBWsFTrpfXacV3cjj73L71kYI=; b=FOcEL9u18Xnh/jLHlx85Fdqrg+TC5eLdLHKR4Hwlgk7q2d0pjGU6Pitt1CPAbYjf42 KocomhAFJOkdpACE0YELppNpqOODdLj0tVlD2UBh6M0kkB09vQl7th3w2rNGLi1IPoGj G43JJBBDL6i9zh0xlFEDcNyDWOcqK+XTBHjtGt8Bk8ULm/UzaUaIzT97+fSGXimcfEfp rd+Xz4+LPIxM/wOT//hBJnPyl0UEmzZJY9BkxZM9A0tx0sw7YVJ9pS48+UwibK1Gu5FI ZZcokeJqgMYwAsvEFH9o7IN5wsVCb2WbG6YnF1qHXRrCnUGcl5VKZ64CJIHMOdTPHCGL LmiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBuZ31JnPRUR54T7k3xlfLqa54pn3nkaF1njMrG55wgcB2evvTg 972m+6t6RthOYQ== X-Received: by 10.98.217.154 with SMTP id b26mr42162816pfl.136.1495690234934; Wed, 24 May 2017 22:30:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-69-149.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.69.149]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m12sm11318146pgn.30.2017.05.24.22.30.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 May 2017 22:30:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: John Wiegley Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id F23D449B264C; Wed, 24 May 2017 22:31:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83inkto7yz.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 22 May 2017 07:01:40 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:132817 Archived-At: >>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii writes: EZ> John, what is your take on this? I actually would prefer to get 26 out sooner, than to backport, but I'm not sure at the moment how big of a headache that would really be. In general, it would be nice to accelerate the schedule for major releases. But whether we have the manpower to really do that is another question. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2