From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#42366: UTF8 QR codes vs. emacs Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 16:35:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87pn8wx3k2.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <875z9xcrrk.fsf@gnus.org> <83a6z99nv3.fsf@gnu.org> <87wo2djhp2.fsf@gnus.org> <834kph9mja.fsf@gnu.org> <87mu39jg7r.fsf@gnus.org> <83zh79879h.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2mt85mp.fsf@gnu.org> <83wo2d85gs.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfir99d0.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33543"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 42366@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 06 16:37:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k3h14-0008d6-Lc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 16:37:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54712 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3h13-0007M1-MQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 10:37:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37424) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3h0w-0007KS-6W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 10:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43144) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3h0v-0001vG-TY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 10:37:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3h0v-0002cs-RI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 10:37:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 14:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42366 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 42366-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42366.159672456510019 (code B ref 42366); Thu, 06 Aug 2020 14:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 42366) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2020 14:36:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54682 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3h01-0002bW-70 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 10:36:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f42.google.com ([209.85.128.42]:39331) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k3gzy-0002ap-Hn for 42366@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 10:36:03 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f42.google.com with SMTP id q76so9909564wme.4 for <42366@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 07:36:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MkU/kJke2DzzY525YATqEGqxP1GRyoG1FYrU4BOauvI=; b=mXSnakbtCv3cAyORnZCa65ncCgav8JhHXVuMReLYf67q0wqLpxgvJqKCeCaYLYkvBO gMU6QybnpwGjT/aZpwkPpOhA48n+zpCbgU8GXhv0M29AZQ6AFTc2+ckMVFgZmvGXPPkI s4ItlJFlec87/X5GymFH1Y4i/4LL+L5/ZbrH2CEmbj/G+w7FQ6eL4+2lUU2EfRFTAmEh AaKyeVQFJZn0Hf+OGlxcaalp7kCptIerIAC16UPedb5w0eq6kyM9U19Av2aypfKASaNa cNZrviSHJbLy4Fl+9Wx/HJUPREHEbCB4aHb7WeLhk4Kd8epdK+R12trd0l2q1LN6TGs0 a57A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MkU/kJke2DzzY525YATqEGqxP1GRyoG1FYrU4BOauvI=; b=qClXIem5v4GULZo4IuQY94sy2oBox42qO+KqDN+gL6sTVroJ9qur2Od6ip3Rtc6qsP E8Trlp8p8D+ngjMx70apSJj8f6YLkcn19bM2zLppGHlL9lGMM3mtQf0VdBrrJncjmBv/ 9WP6lTpvuaS7rujVfE50tispprPRk5CU+324j+7kgDDYjdhvoOp0BA6W3+Z7iyLHkFR/ 36WikrnM+S1b+Bd+jVsyRT4S4HKWMPmW4n59WiTEiJ5x+L5xw/MsVmHaYMWRQCAq1KWu m0t5/My2RBD1fJuT4+FO/g3/oVGOHjyBY1Jj/osXl242cu6uWKV2lUOOojJWW2AaQGFV cKWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530hkEa3nqnFvvnmwSzaDXpaOBXQi797KiQFuprxz2bNBcS03760 o/+K/GT459wuH2n3td49k6Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyp19i+jc5t+YckSlC2rV584nQA4jWtaTFRfNXVgzc5aDWhQT59wwk87jWPhKAewULilPswxw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:b188:: with SMTP id a130mr7855237wmf.125.1596724556379; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 07:35:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rpluim-mac ([2a01:e34:ecfc:a860:d4b5:52d4:854b:9bd0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z8sm6586237wmf.10.2020.08.06.07.35.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 Aug 2020 07:35:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83lfir99d0.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 06 Aug 2020 16:44:59 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:184193 Archived-At: >>>>> On Thu, 06 Aug 2020 16:44:59 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: >> From: Robert Pluim >> Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 42366@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org >> Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:57:04 +0200 >>=20 Eli> To clarify: the original complaint, AFAIU, was about the display i= n a Eli> GUI frame, in which case the layout is entirely ours. You are now Eli> saying that the problem is on TTY frames, but there we don't contr= ol Eli> the layout at all. >>=20 >> I don=CA=BCt think I said that. The TTY frame layout looks ok, the g= ui >> frame one has what looks like extra pixels between the characters. Eli> Then I don't think I understand what you are saying when I look at= the Eli> screenshots you posted. When you say "between the characters", do= you Eli> mean between two successive lines (i.e., vertically), or do you me= an Eli> between two adjacent characters on the same line? I meant between two adjacent characters (did I mix up the screenshots? entirely possible). With Liberation Mono, I see thin horizontal white lines (ie between successive lines) I guess we could put this all down to font differences. Robert