From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50453: 27.2; Portable dumper broken on MSW Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 16:47:07 +0200 Message-ID: References: <871r60v9i0.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <871r60v9i0.fsf@yahoo.com> <83eea0pkdz.fsf@gnu.org> <87y287nsz5.fsf@yahoo.com> <83pmtjmc6e.fsf@gnu.org> <87bl52npea.fsf@yahoo.com> <87sfyem17q.fsf@yahoo.com> <8335qekllx.fsf@gnu.org> <87bl51ncq6.fsf@yahoo.com> <874katnc2h.fsf@yahoo.com> <83v939k91y.fsf@gnu.org> <87bl51tfv4.fsf@yahoo.com> <83k0joipyg.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtojlszb.fsf@yahoo.com> <83tuirhamk.fsf@gnu.org> <87tu60iepp.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13495"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (darwin) Cc: Po Lu , Eli Zaretskii , Daniel Colascione , 50453@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 25 16:48:31 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oRE9n-0003H3-H5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 16:48:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59478 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oRE9l-00064r-SX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 10:48:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52640) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oRE9K-00060X-7c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 10:48:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33004) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oRE9J-0007an-SI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 10:48:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oRE9J-0002Bn-NP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 10:48:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 14:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50453 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 50453-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50453.16614388398351 (code B ref 50453); Thu, 25 Aug 2022 14:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50453) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Aug 2022 14:47:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50984 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oRE8c-0002Ad-QN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 10:47:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-f54.google.com ([209.85.208.54]:42878) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oRE8a-0002AN-9C for 50453@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 10:47:18 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-f54.google.com with SMTP id b44so6170037edf.9 for <50453@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 07:47:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc; bh=O0nYURl0VdA4CzT5PXNjiJUYR1WwuZR/xC/T2ttIQU4=; b=qZ6gb8mSiVuHjuplf0dYev3QQNmUo3jiK/ShCpDLdeKdfhvQD3ms1rKLN9p2K9ylr3 wFZsnX4GlU7u8chov+bHCxIQrhkV7BqLA0rWF+WJaLtqvPhnb0mBZ+4OMQswRfyoLvaz /nP47Lp7vEhThBLShJuvECn90Qq7oc/PnHMDYV0Qbiuyrntm5hGkDFIIR6Ah8Q+fDQB5 knUCHwCgDuVZmgPO1RIDz46jJDsfLxTXDXwDOLfKTSajGc9x7fMkfdHjOACdEflzSx8i m/qipffGqLFe+/s13KmuDsReuEIZN6kP/YMwvwBnd6hNqSvF83QXxS5Lbx6zZ9Fugw+H tmcw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=O0nYURl0VdA4CzT5PXNjiJUYR1WwuZR/xC/T2ttIQU4=; b=S3vTsDFXZKdAoAKOrc2s1Y6haPvTPaIDLLJp908k2fNHUitO+gJqX0mibxODS6esdt 1EWFPmpEdWP5WrCm8uRLl2hm4mVch0cNneDHQ2KiW6MTRarwswHTUtd7GozLWeW+hF7f rcRvW2RfpEERQg0NgZyZPv8pT22VVJhlgeX2KGusHMG/pwsALNQy/vqfGDXOzu02GMEw gjux1Fk/qwvnO7oTjA9IPfEFagJ7FkR/K2SpXEFlsflo0PaPgTjOpgrj+Ys/4hShYYDu Cjj7yBu4+2M4j5zHtiCV4/1myJLyu0p5+eoHFKUDlUajYYCmpNHD+N7WwMyDxMP0Pw/I eRSw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo10XtnPBkMn/94uVljmxaTfzJRfuWwTDP9sVii5/EjvrufeTJbp jIm4clNvo3MdXoh46PSnfqC+ZhYsv85V3Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7U5iMO/8SpaL3Kkf1J97OANEt88k4V214mK/llfOwWv9ki440OqVreRxRJZkOnfwhXINwm+g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:50d4:b0:447:85f:52d5 with SMTP id h20-20020a05640250d400b00447085f52d5mr3503396edb.205.1661438829924; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 07:47:09 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Mini.fritz.box (pd9e364d4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.227.100.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c10-20020a17090618aa00b007317f017e64sm2520451ejf.134.2022.08.25.07.47.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 25 Aug 2022 07:47:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87tu60iepp.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 25 Aug 2022 16:24:02 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:240717 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >> And while at that, can you tell why we request >> DUMP_MEMORY_ACCESS_READWRITE and not DUMP_MEMORY_ACCESS_READ when >> loading from the pdumper file? Do we expect the need to change values >> loaded from the file? > > This is still the case on the trunk. Daniel, do you have any comments > here? I'm not Daniel, but what about relocations? After mapping a .pdmp, pointers have to be computed that fit the location in memory where the .pdmp has been mapped.