From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Markus Triska Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2930: 23.0.92; `accept-process-output' and `sleep-for' do not run sentinels Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:34:35 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87eircjz9o.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> Reply-To: Markus Triska , 2930@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1250527643 27392 80.91.229.12 (17 Aug 2009 16:47:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:47:23 +0000 (UTC) To: gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 17 18:47:15 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Md5MQ-0003cq-UX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:47:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47290 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Md5MQ-0003PK-Bt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:47:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Md5ML-0003Oa-J6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:47:01 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Md5MF-0003NI-EK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:47:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37511 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Md5MF-0003N8-8J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:46:55 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:59650) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Md5ME-0000eq-E7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:46:54 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n7HGkojN021266; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:46:50 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n7HGe6fm019686; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:40:06 -0700 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Markus Triska Original-Sender: Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:40:06 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 2930 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.125052688618833 (code B ref -1); Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:40:06 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 17 Aug 2009 16:34:46 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n7HGYiFp018830 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:34:46 -0700 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Md5AR-0003ZU-NX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:34:43 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Md5AM-0003WA-OM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:34:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38924 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Md5AM-0003Vq-JS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:34:38 -0400 Original-Received: from pinatubo-2.switch.ch ([130.59.1.10]:34592 helo=pinatubo.switch.ch) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Md5AM-0006fi-0J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:34:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [193.171.255.22] (helo=novembaer.univie.ac.at) by pinatubo.switch.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Md5AK-0007DI-Nw for gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:34:36 +0200 Original-Received: from news by novembaer.univie.ac.at with local (Exim 4.20) id 1Md5AJ-000GUK-Se for gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:34:35 +0200 Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug Cancel-Lock: sha1:+6AttOb92nuou9OC8liuY3LxymE= Original-Lines: 11 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: news-access-from.tuwien.ac.at Original-X-Trace: 1250526875 tunews.univie.ac.at 11352 192.35.241.118 Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@tuwien.ac.at X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:47:00 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:30312 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > so maybe we should change it even further? I think a good change would > be to change the code of wait_reading_process_output such that status > changes are taken into account (even when do_display is 0) but only for > the process(es) for which we're waiting. I agree, and I think that if no process at all is specified, then all status changes should be processed. This is for consistency with regular input processing: If there is input from some process, and no particular process is specified, it will also be processed.