From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22983: syntax-ppss returns wrong result. Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 15:58:43 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20160311151512.GD2888@acm.fritz.box> <44b4fa9e-ec8e-98a4-d8ad-e799fffa7959@yandex.ru> <20160319122759.GA2644@acm.fritz.box> <9f36a39b-ea9f-2f61-5400-68de18526ab1@yandex.ru> <9fc66395-045c-1984-f530-033c2ff706f6@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1459724372 2839 80.91.229.3 (3 Apr 2016 22:59:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 22:59:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Alan Mackenzie , 22983@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 04 00:59:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1amqzA-0002gE-2x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 00:59:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55551 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1amqz9-0006nx-69 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 18:59:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34650) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1amqz3-0006ld-Vg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 18:59:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1amqz0-0006jM-Gt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 18:59:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53277) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1amqz0-0006jI-DK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 18:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1amqz0-0004YM-8E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 18:59:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: John Wiegley Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 22:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22983 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22983-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22983.145972433617484 (code B ref 22983); Sun, 03 Apr 2016 22:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22983) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Apr 2016 22:58:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50403 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1amqyu-0004Xr-G9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 18:58:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-f43.google.com ([209.85.218.43]:33971) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1amqyt-0004XX-BV for 22983@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 18:58:55 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-f43.google.com with SMTP id s79so46238372oie.1 for <22983@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 15:58:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=65HkGyGdcytjr4z9aTibd0e7SwZ+itTGtYuIwyOszsc=; b=bCG+hnaQv+QrfvZt4ntThoTrIgQ1B5bwc3H08T+uml0kMuA7Y0VW/gzUkr6UD3vXcF cK+5EHs1Gm6cUEJ57H6G40zFzh7Emlnc5Tf2NjrOXQ88Loy5ixZDwhCqnAddZeUzGfXQ OkU+TQgasyUv9eOd5Zxh1gkSMdAHKj2hSff1yvBe63vZn8WISPT7ycwl3Ydf1OP38RDV 0QrWimXUWdwlq5CXKWV3UavyvkW+6ysDKVTOjGK6ZdvKgu2cC6NlD5hcQaho15RncQ4g SUEVSE26mwsK6HQ8+wODOLn9+9ZZ3pgiZkVRdVGZE5/GDsgMIfsB1tP6ihED2vTCFR9w BDGg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=65HkGyGdcytjr4z9aTibd0e7SwZ+itTGtYuIwyOszsc=; b=JOOrmaPQAmk2TrgF17OsEpFELW4uINXq1e6IrNCpVP0O1spRWbDjQM/Htn3L2XYFrr nQ3++Rsxk4cJmAiFpMYYYyFpA44o8j7icM50m0Mz0UeVzCTFVnOU4+OxBZukfXf+Bjhy BUKdEMKtMgh60UB1Q/rjHxZhZpeQtmkkHvhGxydv01M/7LN6AVkcXgqReCnQcRDACI7d m1VzatgZhHyIfmOPva6cENYHMi7IIo5S+c68zPvR6oAjw7q51OwODIb9aglCMHffFXW/ O5P5TdwhN/uI0yUYG37rOHjAJXN33DYoZZUPGFqIQ+F8KNJOLosN4ZDgFTDJDreAiHJw xZ7A== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIeu5PVgckefj/HlDX6GQFvknKQ8nhZR4CLn0fUdG0eKsA9r0MllC5R3hj+EUkDng== X-Received: by 10.157.39.110 with SMTP id r101mr5493043ota.49.1459724329951; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 15:58:49 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v102sm3185838ota.1.2016.04.03.15.58.48 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 03 Apr 2016 15:58:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8AA4013DAE17B; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 15:58:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9fc66395-045c-1984-f530-033c2ff706f6@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Sun, 27 Mar 2016 04:14:14 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1.50 (darwin) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:115993 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> Dmitry Gutov writes: > The aforementioned patch both fixes the bug and allows syntax-ppss to > continue to be used in the fashion I've mentioned previously. > The question that's holding it, as far as I'm concerned, if whether the > "hard narrowing" discussion reaches a satisfying conclusion. If it does, = we > won't really need syntax-ppss-dont-widen. Have things reached a satisfactory conclusion now? It was hard for me to t= ell by the end of this thread. > I've never said anything about avoiding making changes to it. But when we= do > that, we usually try to accommodate the existing uses (the importance of > which depends on how many uses there are out there). Sure, though it's experimental nature does get taken into account. If a thi= ng is wrong, I'm not interested in accommodating existing workarounds to its wrongness. =2D-=20 John Wiegley GPG fingerprint =3D 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGcBAEBCgAGBQJXAaAjAAoJEMFE2PTxn+YwAeYMAKAejmXQDkA35txd/LDKWAzj bfqdtNbpVV1skKgCjh6k2+Byi7fWNqt7/l+o5R2Mhqf20Nsf9r1iO3/blm6D6E3+ 6pmkZjqY4UCqZkTGjlfVcWVypti2FixWI6inVKy/qju76oyK7hM6OAzjS5hdIzr6 0tCocONtN3h77gcieurowT+seqR4XwkLAxLG2oSfyOhBP3zJYlhIXJrg2uEEJ+JZ ajPU7oArssZmN9hOj4edl/gMsD6dm9IYXN1Jjh6cPT96bCx2lIiFsBwfHzIQ67kc 2CoxprmY73R7lrXz48eaN4zLzTq3a+6ENwYGXV9Yp2nI7dXgN+OANymmQBBK5YcM QoPV8s75xaGAmTK/t+GC9uwH+KVAGloPvt830rueAGP4PQe0LepRb3pptJSPvAFI eKCBQ+1SY5X2X5tf+obLqBVOZpIlvJIYo91zkxXvqTL3vd5/5YorOowRk5iCkcSF BBXipZlS3dybU02VdYke1EAVLY6O4O4SMEp9tkyT5Q== =BTJK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--