bug#58042: 29.0.50; ASAN use-after-free in re_match_2_internal

["Gerd Möllmann" <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>]

Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> writes:

> Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I don't get an abort, but the ASAN error again
>
> Interesting.
>
>> ==67682==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x000107130d00 at pc 0x0001002a481c bp 0x00016fdcc3c0 sp 0x00016fdcc3b8
>> READ of size 8 at 0x000107130d00 thread T0
>>     #0 0x1002a4818 in PSEUDOVECTORP lisp.h:1110
>>     #1 0x1002a4888 in SYMBOL_WITH_POS_P lisp.h:1122
>>     #2 0x10025a338 in EQ lisp.h:1342
>>     #3 0x100280eb0 in run_window_change_functions window.c:3964
>>     #4 0x1000f18c4 in redisplay_internal xdisp.c:16600
>>     #5 0x100107bf8 in redisplay xdisp.c:16111
>>     #6 0x10089364c in -[EmacsView layoutSublayersOfLayer:] nsterm.m:8661
>>     #7 0x1900a9624 in CA::Layer::layout_if_needed(CA::Transaction*)+0x224 (QuartzCore:arm64e+0x20624)
>>     #8 0x1901f661c in CA::Context::commit_transaction(CA::Transaction*,
>>     double, double*)+0x1c0 (QuartzCore:arm6
>>
>> frame #8: 0x0000000100280eb4 emacs`run_window_change_functions at window.c:3964:7
>>    3961		     (de-)selected as its frame's or the globally selected
>>    3962		     window.  */
>>    3963		  if (((frame_selected_change
>> -> 3964			&& (EQ (window, old_selected_window)
>>    3965			    || EQ (window, selected_window)))
>>    3966		       || (frame_selected_window_change
>>    3967			   && (EQ (window, FRAME_OLD_SELECTED_WINDOW (f))
>>
>> (lldb) p window
>> (Lisp_Object) $18 = 0x00000001071c2935 (struct window *) $23 = 0x00000001071c2930
>> (lldb) p old_selected_window
>> (Lisp_Object) $24 = 0x0000000107130d05 (struct Lisp_Vector *) $28 = 0x0000000107130d00
>>
>> old_selected_window looks strange.  It's a global that is not
>> staticpro'd
>
> Isn't old_selected_window supposed to be kept in sync with
> FRAME_OLD_SELECTED_WINDOW in old_selected_frame, with the latter being
> removed once it is deleted?
>
> Would someone who knows the window code well please take a look at this?

I've submitted bug#58327 for this problem, so that it won't be
forgotten.  (I'm sure I will forget it at some point, because I have
added the staticpro in my local branch.)