From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#65344: 28.2; Unable to Edebug cl-flet form which uses argument destructuring Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 08:17:59 +0200 Message-ID: References: <5184DD53-F121-405D-AEE9-6E72E17127EA@gmail.com> <87lee1nsvn.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9861"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: brandon.irizarry@gmail.com, Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= , Michael Albinus , 65344@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 24 08:19:14 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qZ3gY-0002Nm-Ox for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 08:19:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZ3gU-00006Z-GF; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 02:19:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZ3gI-0008VF-NI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 02:19:00 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qZ3gI-0005sI-FD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 02:18:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qZ3gM-00087o-4v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 02:19:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 06:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65344 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 65344-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65344.169285789431164 (code B ref 65344); Thu, 24 Aug 2023 06:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 65344) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Aug 2023 06:18:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35965 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qZ3fa-00086a-4f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 02:18:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]:55580) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qZ3fY-00086M-An for 65344@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 02:18:13 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-52a4737a08fso178201a12.3 for <65344@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 23:18:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1692857882; x=1693462682; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=1bQkiWeUJHoarwGOjliZ7dDIBGJ9Tp8xTyexjKZdEts=; b=O6/a51pmoZtDggsoqnGlHD735T9difCyQtZp5l5iZVP19vDCUI9dGhbJykj891BNsX PkkR4vMG/iEttJAMACcXCI/Bjvzuo6tZunSBpDCKbZwLX3kfHVful+Qc7ZVxijmEI685 02qjULgUJYPa6tt5YK37NxCVpRmjP1jy/5tuzZ8S1ogCMX93O9qivv5JTnp0FvE0Q9Ld IOijfsphMd3VIMu56y6Wq8js9eQAyyXVhSoBj9+Nvut0FS4Z0vDmGWiDeSC412U8vBpb g/h7YKS0UFofbJaiJNXXg+XwjyJY1TpSGPjuBUhgQoxSkHP6eH8wiE+YvqXMiQos5twh d69w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692857882; x=1693462682; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1bQkiWeUJHoarwGOjliZ7dDIBGJ9Tp8xTyexjKZdEts=; b=PaeSnij+Ie6nZ0ps3oRdHAJhQObJd9eFRm8RDAuwUUO7qX3y0RFGNJ0knSCKm81Y90 SLTjP+F45OGMLc+3fS7g8BSB2wi93jx4UOn9FLOdvHIcdU1YtPRRg9q4NFXuOBXPWxsJ kuO5cF8ab5ZRaxGqpXCE8j1p//WBb2/1dXxvfdJDyW8p+UGi2R8BA4QcQx5TXvkdjP7B GtqfyLjeHU0SF18UZ+g33qi2y9exoqeD3Z7Ihzj3gNDPcQC4CFZDWnMNoC6sU17DgVcd IeuKmA1NFiFg9raPX0aXtxWCS3vxK29XjNm6FpK7DAnrGIPk8TdxEQnlXiFkHIycTTW4 /mDA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwoSzoTbCm2D8qEbYiKkUAU2z3JrJfqwrZNMP7LNjP3iaHtDvgg X2QmKAQzVjv6wSEt26SP1uOZ1mwVfgTJmkq+ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEM22oGLnFYp4CwXTdOsuR5/p3xJZDZvZ2pWlSa4mryefWQVIdJB/Ds6j8oqSyBgDGcwcR1AQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2051:b0:525:469a:fc49 with SMTP id bc17-20020a056402205100b00525469afc49mr11097847edb.17.1692857881517; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 23:18:01 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Mini.fritz.box (p4fe3a80a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.227.168.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d19-20020a056402517300b005272523b162sm9950836ede.69.2023.08.23.23.18.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 23 Aug 2023 23:18:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87lee1nsvn.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Thu, 24 Aug 2023 03:14:52 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:268306 Archived-At: Michael Heerdegen writes: > Gerd M=C3=B6llmann writes: > >> Edebug then matches def-form with ((x y)) or (&rest x), and it finds it >> doesn't match. I would have expected that this leads to backtracking >> and trying the second alternative of the &or, but that's not >> happening. > > It's very similar to the originally reported problem. As I said - maybe > look at `edebug-list-form' which is called in both cases and > intentionally inhibits backtracking, AFAIU. That's correct. Setting edebug-gate to t makes not matching an error. That's the, confusing to me, invalid-read-syntax. I understand that. What I don't understand is if that's intended, or maybe an oversight. Oversight, because it prevents a, in my opinion, valid-looking use of def-form like in our case, inside an &or. Difficult. One could of course try filtering out constructs that def-form doesn't like with a preceeding ¬, but that's such an effing solution that my arm hairs stand up. I don't think I'll do that.