From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Filipp Gunbin Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#52063: 28.0.60; Confusing presentation of lambda Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 03:13:35 +0300 Message-ID: References: <83czmqaegb.fsf@gnu.org> <874k82vwe5.fsf@gnus.org> <831r35afde.fsf@gnu.org> <87v90hu36b.fsf@gnus.org> <83v90h8zjw.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1b5u1cl.fsf@gnus.org> <83pmqp8vps.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11500"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (darwin) Cc: 52063@debbugs.gnu.org, Lars Ingebrigtsen , Stefan Monnier To: Philipp Stephani Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 25 01:14:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mq2Ow-0002jy-Hq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 01:14:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42748 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mq2Ou-0002Bb-Qj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 19:14:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43346) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mq2Oo-0002AG-Tj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 19:14:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43761) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mq2Oo-0005aC-Li for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 19:14:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mq2Oo-0006B2-HH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 19:14:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Filipp Gunbin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 00:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52063 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 52063-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52063.163779922623713 (code B ref 52063); Thu, 25 Nov 2021 00:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 52063) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2021 00:13:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55307 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mq2OY-0006AP-Iu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 19:13:46 -0500 Original-Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:36387) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mq2OW-0006AB-5W for 52063@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 19:13:45 -0500 Original-Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA6C5C01B4; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 19:13:39 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 24 Nov 2021 19:13:39 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm1; bh=egy0WDJ082eona+rNPMuZWncxZ djkfkd12T++USJZbY=; b=mWihaBx21puL3vTiCn3ul30zGwwRNGmgcWJB8dvUkP focrVRYcngPEPGlClO4aSZUBnkRKTZc3F23zjcmq/FrtDUXMkpj2tYGgo9SaDHDz L9gDfPj8jNpxS0mAKqcATPxwtCzypRNnCtpAulU1FPwgbRaDDkPF9B5S1SSbQfME tN4pP0h17Ylwnq6HOonuEbqk7HzzC3uNvdbUKHc2okjJ4vymBOwzYXlo8myPuhpy guEGXXtYtjlxO4rzyCCYLmf4o5ubcwN5VeugURWj0OHzOKK3Q8QzXfRW0FRTr7RX HYO1UK3V+8qqgfoxQIj17ykkl3ir+L7WLx5emfJeuTgw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=egy0WD J082eona+rNPMuZWncxZdjkfkd12T++USJZbY=; b=g1ab39S5d2pISTTSQ3bykp Tnw28s9JE7LlSz1xi+nPTpT0PvRpKvFAk4IIMBp16j30FyeaRPWKUvSR8rggJQ2t 4mgks7OpZ1dUmJcxo1lVgnBkbfolixzW/4EGAWw1TI6h1W7vd1zD2wedVoQVFEIY kLEcn58TPeHztNbSYB5zG61sdt7GNrFcy4h7Fih1VhOy0QnubFUnXDMDms5GKIk8 aIxhzW6W2A/YX/tmuYuxaqt+i0o2Q3FbXH2xUgmf8uw2MzbNoFtoL/tkENl2GEJ3 927e8XZtJ1PoOZ4HOgQlDXOCy8cZ1THTza2Dx6Nb8nS+3usH7Cb348LYJMyakpEw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrgeelgdduiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffujghffgffkfggtgesthdtredttdertdenucfhrhhomhephfhilhhiphhp ucfiuhhnsghinhcuoehfghhunhgsihhnsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrfhhmqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpedvveekffdvueevhfdutdejheekvdeufeevtedttdevuddugfeiffeiveei vefhtdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe hfghhunhgsihhnsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrfhhm X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 19:13:36 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Philipp Stephani's message of "Wed, 24 Nov 2021 21:16:18 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:220788 Archived-At: On 24/11/2021 21:16 +0100, Philipp Stephani wrote: > Am Mi., 24. Nov. 2021 um 20:17 Uhr schrieb Stefan Monnier via Bug > reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors > : >> >> Filipp Gunbin [2021-11-24 21:18:43] wrote: >> > On 24/11/2021 11:54 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> >>> what is the recommended binding mode for .emacs? Dynamic or lexical? >> >> `lexical-binding` should be enabled everywhere. >> >> The non-lexical-binding dialect will be phased out. >> > Yes, I know that eventually it'll be phased out, but then perhaps issues >> > such as this need special attention.. >> >> Indeed, but I'm not sure what we can do about it. > > Maybe, once the non-lexical dialect is gone, we can make (closure (t) > (lambda ...)) identical to (lambda ...) and then prefer the latter > again. Or maybe we could just _print_ the closure objects in such a special way that it's more pleasant to read, especially when there's actually empty lexical environment.