From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22044: 24.4; url-expand.el and url-parse.el not conforming to RFC 3986 Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 16:51:03 -0800 Message-ID: References: <86fuzpyen0.fsf@realize.ch> <86610ly9l0.fsf@realize.ch> <87twn6ti5x.fsf@gnus.org> <86ziwytb9g.fsf@realize.ch> <87y4ciup9b.fsf@gnus.org> <86k2o2nle0.fsf@realize.ch> <87wps2m6j1.fsf@gnus.org> <86fuyqnjl2.fsf@realize.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451091140 27744 80.91.229.3 (26 Dec 2015 00:52:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 00:52:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 22044@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alain Schneble Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 26 01:52:10 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aCd5d-0007eI-Ri for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 01:52:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36996 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCd5d-0005pZ-2M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 19:52:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33413) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCd5Z-0005pO-8P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 19:52:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCd5W-0007BD-2K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 19:52:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56912) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCd5V-0007B9-V6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 19:52:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCd5V-00060a-Kw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 19:52:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: John Wiegley Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 00:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22044 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22044-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22044.145109109523065 (code B ref 22044); Sat, 26 Dec 2015 00:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22044) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Dec 2015 00:51:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36281 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCd55-0005zv-Me for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 19:51:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.220.47]:36533) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCd53-0005zj-LM for 22044@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 19:51:34 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id yy13so535604pab.3 for <22044@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 16:51:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=lrCWaDA5cfBk0AujaUGDQTxtB3f5Gc8ZaQywsBn4l20=; b=JEDs1czmG0wpTQt3aYjRcBC4vUFI4DHkBkVDxsNNVFKazaa7OSapqDQwT1Z9ULTqK5 gujGniBysSywgjoYcX0fRm5G5MN/1dn02IKybbAgvYgouvlQe+GDUgcZ27r5c1shWtJZ ywi4RaKlMEv9vLrd9sxtHz81AR09n/bA9BSAKWpe/qB7FKQcd048usnaT1qo7IrfO+fe tMyfGnKJmarA+fqKPbJ4pGuXmKRAB6PRVXJ5VjSjyrADKVdsh0IDtxNcwpFN8aIyvRL6 0NATlhVNZF6N5INnmwQ0G3wLYKxuhmTCw2gMm+judBAI7qedXoUf8lut4F5OSwzwGv9l DLXQ== X-Received: by 10.66.248.74 with SMTP id yk10mr61047735pac.17.1451091087824; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 16:51:27 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fe6sm66575177pab.40.2015.12.25.16.51.26 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Dec 2015 16:51:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 5FD5511B50635; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 16:51:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <86fuyqnjl2.fsf@realize.ch> (Alain Schneble's message of "Sat, 26 Dec 2015 01:23:53 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:110532 Archived-At: >>>>> Alain Schneble writes: > Thanks, great! I see nothing against backporting it to Emacs 25.1. But I > must be honest, I'm pretty new to Emacs and its hard for me to judge the > risks of doing so. At this point mainly ask yourself: 1. Would the change require new, or change existing, documentation or APIs? If so, it should go to master. 2. If it corrects existing behavior, refines that behavior, or removes a stumbling block, it should go to emacs-25. The length of time it takes to get emacs-25 fully ready should not be seen as an opening for "features that could get ready during that time". I haven't seen any attempts to commit such features, I just wanted to make this one point clear. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2