Mattias Engdegård <mattias.engdegard@gmail.com> writes:

> This pattern matches some lines normally matched by the `gnu` rule
> which comes later in the rule list. I don't know if it's a big problem
> -- it may cause misclassification of some messages which should be of
> 'warning' or 'info' type.

Good to know!  So, I studied 'luaL_traceback' in 'lauxlib.c' in Lua and
made the regular expression more precise.  No more mis-classification!

> I'm actually slightly more bothered by this message because it would
> conflict with possible future (re-)relaxation of the `gnu` rule with
> respect to leading whitespace. The matter does come up from time to
> time, and it would be nice to at least have the option to do that.

Ditto; I made other expression more precise as well!

> The 'omake' rule has now been disabled by default for other reasons
> (it's something that has been discussed in the past), so there is at
> least precedence for doing this.

/Note:/ I rebased on top of 'master' (and so the 'omake' patch).

See the new patch, with more precise regular expressions, attached
below.  While on it, I also added support for stack frames with no line
number, as per Lua source code.  Lastly, I added a NEWS entry, as well
as, improved the commit message a bit.

How about now? :)

Rudy