From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Matt Armstrong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44834: Fix for failing indentation of Tcl procs nested in namespace Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:03:35 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87sg8zk4lj.fsf@precedence.co.uk> <87k0rzatbp.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7mo85t6.fsf@gnus.org> <8735y7nk9z.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7mlk5re.fsf@gnus.org> <8335y5l059.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0rgeyju.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40549"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (darwin) Cc: anticrisisg@gmail.com, 44834@debbugs.gnu.org, Richard Stallman , dgutov@yandex.ru To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 10 17:05:06 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l9rzG-000AQe-0Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:05:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55084 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9rzE-0005GL-VO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:05:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34186) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9ryE-0004UU-Bi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:04:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45411) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9ryE-00067y-07 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:04:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9ryD-0008Bx-R0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:04:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Matt Armstrong Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44834 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch fixed Original-Received: via spool by 44834-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44834.161297303031472 (code B ref 44834); Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:04:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44834) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2021 16:03:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56957 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9ry2-0008BY-HI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:03:50 -0500 Original-Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.199]:49565) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9ry0-0008BK-Ad for 44834@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:03:49 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 24.113.169.116 Original-Received: from matts-mbp-2016.lan (24-113-169-116.wavecable.com [24.113.169.116]) (Authenticated sender: matt@rfc20.org) by relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6EBE7FF81A; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:03:38 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87k0rgeyju.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:24:05 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:199783 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Richard Stallman writes: > >> > assign to the FSF the copyright for your contributions. (If a >> > line contains a symbol, consider it nontrivial.) Ask on > > I don't quite understand what you mean by "if a line contains a symbol". > Do you mean that strings or comments don't count? Yes, "non-blank lines added/changed" seems preferable, simply because it is clear and unambiguous. - I think Richard may have implied that a line with a symbol is a sufficient condition for nontriviality, but it isn't clear if intended it to be a necessary condition. I suspect he meant "sufficient", but I think many people would interpret it as a "necessary" condition. - The meaning of "symbol" is not immediately clear in non-lisp code such as C, makefiles, scripts, etc. - If a commit completely rewrites a long comment or doc string, should it be considered "trivial" for the purposes of copyright?