From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24206: 25.1; Curly quotes generate invalid strings, leading to a segfault Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:57:43 -0700 Message-ID: References: <8337m7h1dp.fsf@gnu.org> <83zioffew5.fsf@gnu.org> <83popaf1yz.fsf@gnu.org> <87bn0u3rqc.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83mvkdg91i.fsf@gnu.org> <8b78f23f-4a4f-e568-b760-3350ca7bb8d3@cs.ucla.edu> <83eg5og4n9.fsf@gnu.org> <17f39e7e-31d1-62e5-367d-833b957a39e3@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1471370301 11251 195.159.176.226 (16 Aug 2016 17:58:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:58:21 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.95 (darwin) Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, schwab@linux-m68k.org, 24206@debbugs.gnu.org, nicolas@petton.fr To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 16 19:58:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bZicy-0002dT-C0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 19:58:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43460 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZicv-0007px-IU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:58:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36077) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZico-0007pg-8A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:58:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZick-000608-3v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:58:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33527) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZick-000604-0X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bZicj-0004tK-Pu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:58:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: John Wiegley Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24206 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24206-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24206.147137027418789 (code B ref 24206); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24206) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2016 17:57:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59472 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bZicc-0004sz-BD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:57:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-f182.google.com ([209.85.192.182]:34957) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bZicb-0004sl-8e for 24206@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:57:53 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-f182.google.com with SMTP id x72so29799092pfd.2 for <24206@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:57:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=tF1u+Axvizhiq0udmiYmPY3K8eagwmZ13ayeavvvgtM=; b=eiz99S9blbM0k0uotC7pdLgJ3DHvHMjpqldirdVIC266GDnwnqnbZro0nWCdM/2DYk WVUNr/tQ4LpuUH1xi5LKw8Wv7lMYwtdhz1WKUW8R6yIrCbekhhtGKMypcu6GNWZGlJXT bmzosYX1kGuEwDS19w8S6nw0MV0vQ3fHmMy7s2pcYXg6iD3WNDXLhOsLUsC/hIaHRotx kCkY4m2m6teYDAgodtrpuslskNqJKvO9SFG/ILIkFXnf8FpZ2tobfZcw8+mvoQbNPXfF BZX/FqXXJaSyJUB42SLsiaBurjWeN3soz2B5gKpG+ur3mvLLt8svElimwcoRvLKqVMcz LWqw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=tF1u+Axvizhiq0udmiYmPY3K8eagwmZ13ayeavvvgtM=; b=CjU4Wxv5aogXkRHngaFmUffYddqfDKvV6FxffjPvpxgYfmOuVPHpBMBqHSHzrsTE1w wgtIk67kYdegOh6OO2hshy7SHgnsjEohb+63OR8FL6U/IdMbdyNGLO0ynpAqwKBEVjJV cFaECjP0fL8RvstGHBJevS0rC5rj0r5T9VMEwWFJVpwc85hNgsAuYKKKYbnox3XaBK82 fKAaWn+uL37ZKO2WLVDfH3X9gnM12+44RqbaO4my3vnvlXUgAtHyJEMF4c4GWqpb3kKW Otpf2Pn3rT1u3pxGeDhkdUnvvPOMFzaIEWKp8h+cJSWyFEUOWYaKruLuQEEySEpmOx75 wR4w== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvndpOQXXpyhFamexHsbphi2zl7C4dRIkFv5s3YsHJSya5G3+BnDtaWwdu5pQn+jQ== X-Received: by 10.98.97.7 with SMTP id v7mr14267030pfb.49.1471370267352; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:57:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-69-149.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.69.149]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y9sm17317997pay.25.2016.08.16.10.57.45 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:57:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8CD021FA1004; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:57:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Paul Eggert's message of "Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:55:46 -0700") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:122284 Archived-At: >>>>> Paul Eggert writes: >> Can you please ensure that there is intensive testing being done on these >> patches before pushing them to our release branch? > My name is on the "To:" line of your email, so are you under the impression > that I pushed the patch? I did not, and would not have done so. Eli wrote > and installed the patch, despite my recommendation of a different patch that > would have avoided the failure. So this is really more a matter for Eli. I trust Eli to have chastised himself sufficiently in that case, and expectantly await correction of the problem. :) -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2