From: Eshel Yaron via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: 73330@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#73330: 31.0.50; Incorrect completions for 'cond' clauses
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:25:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1tteb7rva.fsf@sp-byods-145-109-45-221.wireless.uva.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86wmj87y9a.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 19 Sep 2024 13:07:13 +0300")
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 14:36:18 +0200
>> From: Eshel Yaron via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
>>
>> 1. emacs -Q
>> 2. Insert "(cond (current-p
>> 3. Hit M-TAB to complete
>>
>> We're completing a symbol in the condition of a cond clause, so it is
>> expected to be completed as a variable, to current-prefix-argument.
>> However, Emacs mistakenly thinks that we're completing a function name,
>> and completes to current-bidi-paragraph-direction.
>
> Thanks. Does the patch below give good results?
It helps, but also seems to cause a regression. With this change I get:
1. emacs -Q
2. Insert "(cond ((current-p"
^note the additional parenthesis
3. Hit M-TAB to complete
This shows an opposite bug: Emacs should complete function names (and
without the change, it does), but with the change we now get variable
name completion.
Thanks,
Eshel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-19 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-18 12:36 bug#73330: 31.0.50; Incorrect completions for 'cond' clauses Eshel Yaron via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-09-19 10:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-09-19 12:25 ` Eshel Yaron via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors [this message]
2024-09-19 13:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-09-19 14:33 ` Eshel Yaron via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-09-19 14:33 ` Eshel Yaron via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-09-19 16:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1tteb7rva.fsf@sp-byods-145-109-45-221.wireless.uva.nl \
--to=bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
--cc=73330@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=me@eshelyaron.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).