From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Liu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12263: 24.2; c-at-expression-start-p Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2019 10:57:25 +0800 Message-ID: References: <87sgn9vmyi.fsf@joffe.skangas.se> <20191101112636.GA6473__22786.3558496878$1572607651$gmane$org@ACM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="95885"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (macOS 10.14.6) Cc: 12263@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Kangas To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 03 03:58:14 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iR65l-000Ooq-MD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 03:58:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51684 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iR65j-0008Bt-TC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 22:58:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43555) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iR65e-0008Bj-Ff for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 22:58:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iR65a-0001kd-Jg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 22:58:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52705) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iR65a-0001kO-G6; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 22:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iR65a-0000xk-At; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 22:58:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Leo Liu Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-cc-mode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2019 02:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12263 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,cc-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 12263-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12263.15727498593666 (code B ref 12263); Sun, 03 Nov 2019 02:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12263) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2019 02:57:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33293 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iR65C-0000x4-VU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 22:57:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf1-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:33341) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iR65B-0000wr-IN for 12263@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 22:57:38 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-f174.google.com with SMTP id c184so9806119pfb.0 for <12263@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 19:57:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=nzzuaRsd3iy/c0L7OP5966KuaZ5TgKZufiiAPuO8dLw=; b=L0EBJeKZfFKQxVxelnDsXYA0EeV3DevMHqA3WSRPXFwu1wfPrIyNsLUE4GcJMk4GTk CzJ5PStFOMOdf+cyjI42tMX1HSaINUyjUy4IBJ1T95xLKZ8F+ia1+vGGFCmZqsE0mw+D DvT5XoaaQ5iloBKE+kfxLprjdo0PZYwPcpw9X95OJgmG0MsAUTuVPrx7tpMvk2k6HjYL 6scotXoxRfBLjlEnEe94Yt+jWYvZJvR6ghWlDLsq7uFf2HJ+zs2f3x34gG5KP/dwST3z wCTBwzsMsqoZ6zpEOH0Pd/y6kNULau9Uwv5N5K17m7tEg0G1LXTIVmL0Pb79U201cbC0 Cw8Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=nzzuaRsd3iy/c0L7OP5966KuaZ5TgKZufiiAPuO8dLw=; b=TMYUhbfl2GaYzsQq5sRjpmZHDPOqdL+sLDTM7ND9G5YDkki0BPCO6UF+3FOG278GrB mXyioeqcE5CD4TiCynEnMbpWwV7BvclxS8TiOfXszjJB/mqjfLGDHc3reINF3dHPHL0z P2kewadBepe1FlVduh8QgU8HAYcqlyLeZlpy2TzWo0UNKWmZZv4uOmL+mCPbfvz9PRvh GTegaRpklrQWXMgMMSoJmhOj4gXweSswm3DPWHRfkzlYI0VhIyLExOlg6RLYXFDgkuBH tLX8w2t8XAJxzajm//LFOzc60dl8d4bTE2Gf574+gGFAZ0OxpvPucGV8Jm674p6ccuub fLMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXZoGhrbV4i8q63Et+T44nyoaQRnwxQQ+dW7CJ5OY4LsYY8t4T3 OjqUXjrXmxqGwp5bre0UOqMKG53T X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyP7rTLt8K7I0ZeUwMjrBnPOiVZA4iqh39aJ90LK8MShF9IQVdvDCCUpGENSIWYUiDsXA3dyQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:5286:: with SMTP id w6mr26562993pjh.76.1572749851057; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 19:57:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Zeuss-MacBook-Air.local ([124.106.221.58]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s13sm7809750pfe.94.2019.11.02.19.57.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 02 Nov 2019 19:57:29 -0700 (PDT) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoAgMAAADxkFD+AAAADFBMVEUvT09qWs3/pQD///+J kUVcAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB9cBBwMLOd3veKQA AACuSURBVBjTldE9CgIxEAXgB+lEyFUC2wo5ikdZ8DSypxhMY7H9VuIVwlqkGRgnm59VsHGafIQ3 CZlAtmKIRaHETgYa12lqvEsPYKf8wXHsPGfqPaUM0g9aJPKFXkmNQmSDqwzz4Fpgpz+6WAPY2z5o uPJJpu0uypcl4nyCibMLQ8lCiVjayLoQvw5LsVKQuHPRR958HZbOcVsKeepcLxpByjycGvnKmY+c MBvrtyjfe0vmuLvdq/kAAAAASUVORK5CYII= In-Reply-To: <20191101112636.GA6473__22786.3558496878$1572607651$gmane$org@ACM> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Fri, 1 Nov 2019 11:26:36 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:170856 Archived-At: On 2019-11-01 11:26 +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > Leo, can you remember at all what (if anything) you were using this > function for? I used it once in my init script. But > Given that it appears to be wholly unused, I'm inclined to mark this > function as obsolete or deprecated, and then to remove it later. It > doesn't seem to be worth the trouble to make it work properly. The same > might also apply to the function c-at-statement-start-p. I can live with this change. Thanks for asking. Leo