unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eshel Yaron via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: 74437@debbugs.gnu.org, mail@alternateved.com
Subject: bug#74437: 30.0.92; completion-preview-idle-delay is delayed by flyspell
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 16:52:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1ldxddhri.fsf@macbookpro.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86sermrr8i.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 20 Nov 2024 15:04:29 +0200")

Hi,

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Eshel Yaron <me@eshelyaron.com>
>> Cc: 74437@debbugs.gnu.org,  mail@alternateved.com
>> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:16:56 +0100
>
>> > Also, what happens if there are other async
>> > subprocesses running in parallel, like maybe Grep or compilation or
>> > url-retrieve?
>> 
>> They make progress, which seems to work as expected, at least with Grep.
>> That is if we use the previous patch, with the one below we pass non-nil
>> JUST-THIS-ONE argument to accept-process-output when called from a timer
>> so other processes shouldn't see new output during this call.  Either
>> way works, AFAICT.
>
> The question is: what do users expect to happen in those cases?

I don't know, IIUC it is just a short period (spell-checking one word)
in which other processes either do or don't see output, so I don't think
it matters that much to users either way.  It seems more natural to let
other processes make progress, because why not?  But again, either way
works for me, since both let us reconcile Flyspell with idle timers.


Best,

Eshel





  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-20 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-19 11:55 bug#74437: 30.0.92; completion-preview-idle-delay is delayed by flyspell Tomasz Hołubowicz via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-11-19 16:13 ` Eshel Yaron via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-11-19 16:56   ` Tomasz Hołubowicz via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-11-19 17:19   ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-11-19 18:40     ` Eshel Yaron via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-11-19 19:10       ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-11-19 20:16         ` Eshel Yaron via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-11-20 13:04           ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-11-20 15:52             ` Eshel Yaron via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors [this message]
2024-11-20 16:29               ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m1ldxddhri.fsf@macbookpro.home \
    --to=bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
    --cc=74437@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=mail@alternateved.com \
    --cc=me@eshelyaron.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).