From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Leo Liu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24585: 25.1; avoid hack in ggtags.el to run compilation-auto-jump timer Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 10:27:49 +0800 Message-ID: References: <83twcrks7q.fsf@gnu.org> <83int5jpde.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1475807374 26180 195.159.176.226 (7 Oct 2016 02:29:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 02:29:34 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (macOS 10.12) Cc: 24585@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 07 04:29:29 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bsKuR-0004NW-1R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 04:29:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60268 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsKuP-00042N-Ev for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 22:29:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58056) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsKuJ-00042B-Bx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 22:29:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsKuF-0006uK-2X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 22:29:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40893) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsKuE-0006u4-VW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 22:29:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bsKuE-0008BR-L6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 22:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Leo Liu Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 02:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24585 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24585-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24585.147580728631371 (code B ref 24585); Fri, 07 Oct 2016 02:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24585) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2016 02:28:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47082 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bsKtK-00089u-Ic for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 22:28:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-f170.google.com ([209.85.192.170]:33038) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bsKtI-00089I-Er for 24585@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 22:28:04 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 190so17358741pfv.0 for <24585@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 19:28:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=d+Gk4zStvy+dJF671r9T9mhkNERpmFrZ45tR9cpoaSs=; b=kTrVongsaVYfaeqsZ+VgQQtNF604UI8vp03tNa8cgyxfGsog5cDqYrglJZ8HAq41Of XnNB1E/ueQgpp/5QzpYlSSllLyEhj/EUgIlnrhaj0v9xVaz13lJMTuVf5fwjjJsbYWJd tpoWLXvIDHanJq7vyf9wVjca4JkGzzk1V4fHjSKzDWIC44POGA2xS+srN5mcYfK8cdgK eLS+7dWnSbLGL8jUGvZrwhXuoLjtCOLorsaeynO+Ok3nOvWKqjySP06eJ4CkCdiirkIm Il8w/4rpdW0obYlhTG/TeIp0IG0lwe6QV8SOAot/+mvs1KnwwE3yuJXL2Fi7aQ5e7g/S tKuw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=d+Gk4zStvy+dJF671r9T9mhkNERpmFrZ45tR9cpoaSs=; b=Xo9uPb8Ghjj2Y8by2sP9oeFoGb7OIKxEWbcW4ANOFV4Qo9QkxmXkbCQ2pkyl87TUz4 ApVAXYmpka5G2Ra7RA8R1hlou6kZSxuOoq5QSWcQifK4u3YlPF/Jw2xEql5bnuKMic3Z WGzo91kYN8gS5E8t1ioWt12tLrqzE9muMl7MZHFkGv57DPsUNu6aRu+yjMjtcfYGqFXi 1z4MFZLkOa5iPiCuR7UjLOU4nYKtf1pIVTAwE93V0Y3fp8yo0pLX1rpGw+PJvL8GttQW FaMveOG5JQVC2slnPTjf0Qm2cr/BX3WGTZlUfTXQT5A1YpDghP8waQ/NPTVvKB1ZnQcq FA6A== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnPRH7VEA9qVMR/iYyXxhVVndSAo5Zw+TjZHN9xf2ETgWms/qIFbmiXIngNprai+w== X-Received: by 10.98.0.193 with SMTP id 184mr24627385pfa.20.1475807278366; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 19:27:58 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zeuss-MacBook-Pro.local ([139.59.241.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d19sm8952504pfd.59.2016.10.06.19.27.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 Oct 2016 19:27:57 -0700 (PDT) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACkAAAApAQAAAACAGz1bAAABKElEQVQYlWNg3NIt5FDPUPt7 4+X79Qyucz5/ugik+L2PBgKpyphaIK921q23QDnG0NBQoMr/vaWl9f8ZLL78uPv5PwN7RETfzXoG jhmFz27XM0RXmpuY/WfY+fv0Mc56BvFybfXA/wwL5t/wF61n2PU59axXPcOVzbmSW/8zrNt1benC /ww70hqUU/4zKCtrT9jwn8FhwynbufUMendE2aLqGRpdX9al1zM8eh17lKeeQcTMrdD5P8P3j/YT Q/8zXHSb7p1Qz/C4OM2JuZ7hgtI7K6AjqsMnf8j4z8C6xG1tw3+GqpqvsVn/GTzmpD9j/8/wP/oZ S/l/Bka+QO/g/wy15ueeFQL9N1O8mPU/g+umV3t1gdT0/1bTgHLqYVeXAlWKpMWt+w8Az82C9nHf X0cAAAAASUVORK5CYII= In-Reply-To: (Leo Liu's message of "Fri, 07 Oct 2016 09:21:12 +0800") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:124140 Archived-At: On 2016-10-07 09:21 +0800, Leo Liu wrote: > On 2016-10-06 21:37 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> That depends on how long is this problem present. Can you tell? > > Originally I thought by inserting a (sit-for 0) I fixed the problem but > people have reported otherwise > https://github.com/leoliu/ggtags/issues/89 (which is 20 months old) > > Leo After some experiments the proposed patch might not work at all. compilation-auto-jump timer is fired by the font-locking engine. By my observation it is possible that compilation-finish-functions (from a process sentinel) are executed before font-locking even by inserting (compilation--ensure-parse (point-max)) in ggtags-global-handle-exit. Do you see any anomaly in the observation? The hack that is now in ggtags.el may not work either. None of the people that reported https://github.com/leoliu/ggtags/issues/89 have confirmed the fix. And I personally don't know how to reproduce it. Leo