From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eshel Yaron via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#65386: [PATCH] ; Refine some 'package-vc' docstrings Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 11:10:06 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ledwipkb.fsf@posteo.net> <874jkime6r.fsf@posteo.net> Reply-To: Eshel Yaron Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34002"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 65386@debbugs.gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 29 11:11:10 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qaukd-0008bN-6j for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 11:11:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qaukS-0008CX-UP; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 05:10:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qaukR-0008CK-Qg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 05:10:55 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qaukR-0000HV-GM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 05:10:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qaukX-00069K-Vd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 05:11:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eshel Yaron Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 09:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65386 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 65386-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65386.169330021923582 (code B ref 65386); Tue, 29 Aug 2023 09:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 65386) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Aug 2023 09:10:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49528 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qaujr-00068H-F1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 05:10:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.eshelyaron.com ([107.175.124.16]:51894 helo=eshelyaron.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qaujo-000685-TQ for 65386@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 05:10:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eshelyaron.com; s=mail; t=1693300208; bh=TNDcHSfrYuPY+PP572LajPw7Tnlbg8AAbwyWhtb1vSk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=LRDq2JzFsbUxsJehG07Ic/WbfW+tYRiTnqTYklkZ82MtuqznoMdHVwdFvZ59PKrEU R+m8qTNEGXraJBJVXbCaX3iqEBJ0nErRcyBeZPU2b7KfrL8HXi8FHv3zUu7sv13H8b aQvQbA28591UhQC0V+jy5RrjaVHpSdzybcUYP6F+ZCLUBsFJFTxDE8a5MU4/xrc+u9 eu0ISCIy9q5SZJX5xgtoE/QC/en+BSXB1sRRNb0eAKehBLwB/V0eaVFG81n/2BkZPn lUUgnBAj2QS7b15899w4i+qhsHi3KM4KmePGZQwVQB/eq+2Qgmq83/crEKWfqO8ufn sHoWEzvpBeOiQ== In-Reply-To: <874jkime6r.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Tue, 29 Aug 2023 08:43:24 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:268658 Archived-At: Philip Kaludercic writes: > Eshel Yaron writes: > >> >> I got a message saying that this bug is now closed, but I don't see that >> the relevant patches have been applied. >> Just to make sure, is this intentional? > > No, that was my mistake. I had falsely believed, that the patches were > pushed to master, but this was not the case. It has been done now. > Sorry for the confusion. > Got it, no worries, and thanks :)