From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Liu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13999: 24.3.50; rng-validate-while-idle -> (error "Selecting deleted buffer") Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 22:13:11 +0800 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364048052 8304 80.91.229.3 (23 Mar 2013 14:14:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 14:14:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13999@debbugs.gnu.org To: Carsten Bormann Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 23 15:14:34 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UJPDJ-0003UF-Ps for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 15:14:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56895 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJPCw-0004BS-7L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 10:14:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54801) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJPCs-00046w-A4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 10:14:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJPCr-0001rp-6p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 10:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38198) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJPCr-0001rh-2i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 10:14:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UJPEo-0003dI-AW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 10:16:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Leo Liu Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 14:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13999 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13999-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13999.136404813113926 (code B ref 13999); Sat, 23 Mar 2013 14:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13999) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2013 14:15:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42307 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UJPEI-0003cY-A1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 10:15:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com ([209.85.220.45]:43352) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UJPED-0003cO-Tc for 13999@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 10:15:28 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id kl13so359106pab.32 for <13999@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 07:13:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lh6y6pYscTwvYLkzBT2+Elh1UOS4yqD5peAjeROYFgk=; b=ecpIQ4MtwUURMnaXwxhtuapz8IX4YMuncNibgT2VPJLmpMGD8ft4YH/Vba2Qjvtpr6 PE14Kqz5P1urG7A362ci3zHgYnxCE57mwXNK142kRvyJqFNzJVcKmzqVkFzGEi5GXFlX oSezXX+tjCifZR8Bsq9HiOhfxlUPxGkSS5cw1SXGzRuaT7MPFj1+HnGP3mO4NyMAxDQ2 soSkWIs59yAriCf8VFqrPJ4+tIpVq46DWsk5IXB7b1XS3VgmGnydMcNenWg1x4AF/6nA FC9tnXfn+Zwlmr+pmVdeIpu3bwkXsJKI27IWVRNrPTaYhGFTD3z+gHHKIa6c2pfApBCs fZbw== X-Received: by 10.68.241.102 with SMTP id wh6mr8187000pbc.150.1364048002821; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 07:13:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Zeuss-MacBook.local ([119.161.133.111]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dl1sm6299413pbc.17.2013.03.23.07.13.18 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 23 Mar 2013 07:13:22 -0700 (PDT) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAElBMVEUAAAAAAP+LRRP0pGC+ vr7///+7mT1iAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB9cBBwMO DhglKe4AAAEsSURBVCjPbZNBboQwDEV/Cd4X9QJRThApmn0XYW+Jyf2v0m+HhqDBgiAe9rcTG7QH w/1Vn2Ar8gBb/ocywSN3qK9T3z4eFDB4eApocBpeBs1RSykoJd8gQcm8pGmHXFso3ajnmsqV0TnY DQkOfXUfN5NwaI7AWTVOyEhcu1aHmdWItHddUVUcUgUBCkitu8V6ditHVOVdqzl2EQ1ZVGTbdK0V 7cqn8vWzoU5Q/bF9Y/Y0cRU1xwkys5dJ+Dt6pBDWifcNQml8Gh2JVmPSoQzo7en0grswkxrUGYJ7 0hSxxAGr7ZMwYcHIzprpi7TENEE1xtiYxixRlCfPBsUUrwHD7uGIwATrbnODJcVrPpVn3hxiGloe m/S+z3CtuzUSMo83N4DPH+F0evwR3P4A2k+75838OKQAAAAASUVORK5CYII= In-Reply-To: (Carsten Bormann's message of "Sat, 23 Mar 2013 08:54:08 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (OS X 10.8.3) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:72828 Archived-At: On 2013-03-23 15:54 +0800, Carsten Bormann wrote: > Well, how do you test that... > I played around with background-validating an XML file, scrolling > while that happens, and that seems to work. > I don't use stealthy jit-lock etc., though, and my XML files are of > moderate size (couple hundred kB), so maybe I'm not in the target > group addressed by the original hack. > > It seems really solving the problem the code was trying to address > would require having a priority scheme for idle timer work: Validation > happens in idle time but may be higher priority than other idle timer > work. Another way of blocking other idle timer work while doing > sit-for/input-pending-p would, of course, also help; this might need > exposing the READABLE_EVENTS_DO_TIMERS_NOW flag from input-pending-p > and sit-for. > > Gr=FC=DFe, Carsten OK thanks for the information. I use nxml even less. I only use it to edit plist files on OSX which are small in general. So I'll assume it is good enough. Leo