From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12691: 24.1; thing-at-point list of possible symbols Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:12:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: <874nldzjap.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1351527167 23701 80.91.229.3 (29 Oct 2012 16:12:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@gnu.org To: 12691@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 29 17:12:55 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TSrxM-0005Q3-0r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:12:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42022 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TSrxD-0004dl-M5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:12:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33404) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TSrx6-0004dP-NE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:12:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TSrx5-0003Ym-Qk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:12:36 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56355) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TSrx5-0003Yf-Nc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:12:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TSrzS-0006a8-3Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:15:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12691 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12691-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12691.135152729625277 (code B ref 12691); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12691) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Oct 2012 16:14:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38373 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TSrzM-0006Ze-7D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:14:56 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:53448) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TSrzJ-0006ZV-PU for 12691@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:14:55 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TSrww-0004S1-4e; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:12:26 -0400 X-Spook: PGP illuminati Majic Al-Qaeda offensive information X-Ran: T=dYXOmu9.)JUu?Z("DA,PuvH|[B]BuGui%8{*/$&(Gsa#4VrDL X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <874nldzjap.fsf@gnu.org> (Chong Yidong's message of "Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:03:58 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:66197 Archived-At: Chong Yidong wrote: > Jerome Truong writes: > >> Not a bug, just a suggestion to add `number' to the list of symbols so >> it's readily know to coders that number-at-point is available. > > OK, done. Thanks. I don't think he meant quite what you installed, since (thing-at-point 'number) doesn't work AFAICS. I think he mean "the function number-at-point also exists". Cf evalling (thing-at-point 'number)4 (number-at-point)4 The former returns nil, the latter `4'.