From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9639: 24.0.90; Problem with bury-buffer in minibuffer-hide-completions Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 07:38:18 +0800 Message-ID: References: <87hb3thebv.fsf@escher.home> <4E86D879.7060105@gmx.at> <944D5D429FE44884ABAFF93521DEBB73@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: 9639@debbugs.gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317513957 3174 80.91.229.12 (2 Oct 2011 00:05:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 00:05:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9639@debbugs.gnu.org, 'Stephen Berman' To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 02 02:05:52 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RA9Z2-0001lT-LT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 02:05:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41719 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RA9Z2-0002Yn-5J for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 20:05:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60829) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RA9Z0-0002YI-3Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 20:05:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RA9Yz-0001q6-3X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 20:05:50 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33222) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RA9Yz-0001q2-28 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 20:05:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RA9aB-0005iU-17 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 20:07:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Leo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 00:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9639 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9639-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9639.131751396921896 (code B ref 9639); Sun, 02 Oct 2011 00:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9639) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2011 00:06:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RA9ZI-0005h6-3D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 20:06:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.161.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RA9ZF-0005gy-VD for 9639@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 20:06:07 -0400 Original-Received: by ggnk3 with SMTP id k3so244958ggn.3 for <9639@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:04:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:face:reply-to:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=jteZLypSP0G4t17qnutNJN9YXwujpvIezQ1Q3vl+5tk=; b=sEV5Fhsz8J/AAv2+j5C8KJVDKcEmmcVDFMfyuf3NxNTC/6BRZc2sqISvG75ag88gPK NvEoDYX8mUIY+aCylv+ZPLGplD7N/m/5maD+DlJNSwLjIwqzqvqmE0o0pinKD5ywAiPy 2nTtKQTdOm8DoVCtA8vjDhbG8Hw35u6ahZWvI= Original-Received: by 10.68.12.162 with SMTP id z2mr68793774pbb.122.1317513890633; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:04:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Victoria.local ([222.77.98.74]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e3sm35449694pbi.7.2011.10.01.17.04.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:04:49 -0700 (PDT) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACkAAAApAQAAAACAGz1bAAABKElEQVQYlWNg3NIt5FDPUPt7 4+X79Qyucz5/ugik+L2PBgKpyphaIK921q23QDnG0NBQoMr/vaWl9f8ZLL78uPv5PwN7RETfzXoG jhmFz27XM0RXmpuY/WfY+fv0Mc56BvFybfXA/wwL5t/wF61n2PU59axXPcOVzbmSW/8zrNt1benC /ww70hqUU/4zKCtrT9jwn8FhwynbufUMendE2aLqGRpdX9al1zM8eh17lKeeQcTMrdD5P8P3j/YT Q/8zXHSb7p1Qz/C4OM2JuZ7hgtI7K6AjqsMnf8j4z8C6xG1tw3+GqpqvsVn/GTzmpD9j/8/wP/oZ S/l/Bka+QO/g/wy15ueeFQL9N1O8mPU/g+umV3t1gdT0/1bTgHLqYVeXAlWKpMWt+w8Az82C9nHf X0cAAAAASUVORK5CYII= In-Reply-To: <944D5D429FE44884ABAFF93521DEBB73@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 1 Oct 2011 07:38:33 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3.50 (Mac OS X 10.6.8) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 20:07:03 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52054 Archived-At: On 2011-10-01 22:38 +0800, Drew Adams wrote: > Better yet, the behavior should be customizable (delete, make invisible, > iconify, put on a different tab,...), but the _default_ behavior should simply > be to *delete* the frame. I have never been in a situation where iconification makes sense. Leo