* bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/
@ 2012-02-08 5:40 Leo
2012-02-13 18:47 ` Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Leo @ 2012-02-08 5:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 10759; +Cc: Ted Zlatanov
There are ert-deftest littering around in $TOPDIR/lisp/.
Could we have all the tests put in TOPDIR/test? Thanks.
Leo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/
2012-02-08 5:40 bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ Leo
@ 2012-02-13 18:47 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-02-14 1:23 ` Leo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2012-02-13 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leo; +Cc: 10759
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:40:07 +0800 Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com> wrote:
L> There are ert-deftest littering around in $TOPDIR/lisp/.
L> Could we have all the tests put in TOPDIR/test? Thanks.
I've moved the url-future ERT test out to test/automated. Can I close this?
Thanks
Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/
2012-02-13 18:47 ` Ted Zlatanov
@ 2012-02-14 1:23 ` Leo
2012-02-14 1:50 ` Glenn Morris
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Leo @ 2012-02-14 1:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 10759
On 2012-02-14 02:47 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> I've moved the url-future ERT test out to test/automated. Can I close this?
Thank you for fixing this. Yes, please close it.
Leo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/
2012-02-14 1:23 ` Leo
@ 2012-02-14 1:50 ` Glenn Morris
2012-02-14 2:40 ` Leo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2012-02-14 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leo; +Cc: 10759
Leo wrote:
> On 2012-02-14 02:47 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
>> I've moved the url-future ERT test out to test/automated. Can I close this?
>
> Thank you for fixing this. Yes, please close it.
You don't care about the ones in gnus/registry.el, gnus/gnus-registry.el
then? :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/
2012-02-14 1:50 ` Glenn Morris
@ 2012-02-14 2:40 ` Leo
2012-02-14 13:20 ` Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Leo @ 2012-02-14 2:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Glenn Morris; +Cc: 10759
On 2012-02-14 09:50 +0800, Glenn Morris wrote:
> You don't care about the ones in gnus/registry.el, gnus/gnus-registry.el
> then? :)
It'd be better to move them to the dedicated test directories too. But
gnus is maintained outside Emacs. I don't know what best to do here.
Leo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/
2012-02-14 2:40 ` Leo
@ 2012-02-14 13:20 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-02-14 14:34 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2012-02-14 17:37 ` Leo
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2012-02-14 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leo; +Cc: 10759
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:40:18 +0800 Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com> wrote:
L> On 2012-02-14 09:50 +0800, Glenn Morris wrote:
>> You don't care about the ones in gnus/registry.el, gnus/gnus-registry.el
>> then? :)
L> It'd be better to move them to the dedicated test directories too. But
L> gnus is maintained outside Emacs. I don't know what best to do here.
Yes, for Gnus it's better to keep them as they are. Perhaps if Gnus had
its own test directory...
Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/
2012-02-14 13:20 ` Ted Zlatanov
@ 2012-02-14 14:34 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2012-02-14 17:37 ` Leo
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2012-02-14 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leo; +Cc: 10759
Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
> Yes, for Gnus it's better to keep them as they are. Perhaps if Gnus had
> its own test directory...
I just noticed the other day that there's a "tests" directory in git
Gnus. :-)
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Sent from my Rome
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/
2012-02-14 13:20 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-02-14 14:34 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
@ 2012-02-14 17:37 ` Leo
2012-02-14 19:10 ` Ted Zlatanov
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Leo @ 2012-02-14 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 10759
On 2012-02-14 21:20 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> Yes, for Gnus it's better to keep them as they are. Perhaps if Gnus had
> its own test directory...
>
> Ted
On 2012-02-14 22:34 +0800, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> I just noticed the other day that there's a "tests" directory in git
> Gnus. :-)
I think we have what is needed to separate those tests and put them in
the dedicated folders. What do you think?
Leo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/
2012-02-14 17:37 ` Leo
@ 2012-02-14 19:10 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-02-15 13:41 ` Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2012-02-14 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leo, Ding Mailing List; +Cc: 10759
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:37:22 +0800 Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com> wrote:
L> On 2012-02-14 21:20 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
>> Yes, for Gnus it's better to keep them as they are. Perhaps if Gnus had
>> its own test directory...
L> On 2012-02-14 22:34 +0800, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
>> I just noticed the other day that there's a "tests" directory in git
>> Gnus. :-)
L> I think we have what is needed to separate those tests and put them in
L> the dedicated folders. What do you think?
Done, correctly I hope.
Ding list: all the registry.el and gnus-registry.el ERT tests are moved
to tests/gnustest-registry.el
Any other tests I should move?
Thanks
Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/
2012-02-14 19:10 ` Ted Zlatanov
@ 2012-02-15 13:41 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-02-15 14:27 ` Leo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2012-02-15 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leo; +Cc: 10759, Ding Mailing List
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:10:55 -0500 Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> wrote:
TZ> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:37:22 +0800 Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com> wrote:
L> On 2012-02-14 21:20 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
>>> Yes, for Gnus it's better to keep them as they are. Perhaps if Gnus had
>>> its own test directory...
L> On 2012-02-14 22:34 +0800, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
>>> I just noticed the other day that there's a "tests" directory in git
>>> Gnus. :-)
L> I think we have what is needed to separate those tests and put them in
L> the dedicated folders. What do you think?
TZ> Done, correctly I hope.
TZ> Ding list: all the registry.el and gnus-registry.el ERT tests are moved
TZ> to tests/gnustest-registry.el
TZ> Any other tests I should move?
I think we're OK now; can I close this bug?
Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/
2012-02-15 13:41 ` Ted Zlatanov
@ 2012-02-15 14:27 ` Leo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Leo @ 2012-02-15 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 10759
On 2012-02-15 21:41 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> I think we're OK now; can I close this bug?
OK ;)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-15 14:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-08 5:40 bug#10759: 23.4; Move url-future-test to test/ Leo
2012-02-13 18:47 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-02-14 1:23 ` Leo
2012-02-14 1:50 ` Glenn Morris
2012-02-14 2:40 ` Leo
2012-02-14 13:20 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-02-14 14:34 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2012-02-14 17:37 ` Leo
2012-02-14 19:10 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-02-15 13:41 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-02-15 14:27 ` Leo
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).