From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tak Kunihiro Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35389: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Emacs on macOS sets mouse-wheel variables directly Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 13:24:15 +0900 Message-ID: References: <83zhnsb75h.fsf@gnu.org> <20190512110504.GA82901@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <86pnonjlpj.fsf@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> <83a7fqbfcl.fsf@gnu.org> <86k1eqn592.fsf@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> <83o942cxm6.fsf@gnu.org> <834l5td4hl.fsf@gnu.org> <837eao9l7t.fsf@gnu.org> <20190519123201.GA4246@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <83h89n80un.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="198831"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (darwin) Cc: Alan Third , rpluim@gmail.com, npostavs@gmail.com, 35389@debbugs.gnu.org, homeros.misasa@gmail.com, tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 23 06:25:15 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hTfI2-000pah-8B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 May 2019 06:25:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57402 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hTfI1-0005ty-8X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 May 2019 00:25:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33129) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hTfHu-0005rr-3c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2019 00:25:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hTfHs-0003R9-5V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2019 00:25:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58361) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hTfHq-0003Qa-Ig for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2019 00:25:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hTfHq-0003C1-DF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2019 00:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tak Kunihiro Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 04:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35389 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 35389-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35389.155858546812226 (code B ref 35389); Thu, 23 May 2019 04:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35389) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2019 04:24:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43672 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hTfHH-0003B8-Ie for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2019 00:24:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-f170.google.com ([209.85.214.170]:35055) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hTfHF-0003As-Ah for 35389@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2019 00:24:25 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-f170.google.com with SMTP id p1so2128502plo.2 for <35389@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 22 May 2019 21:24:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RMklPTn9+5DOelDz4sfltirzMz8wpJnsRMbkOrCjFTA=; b=bcIYran10S+SylQQX0ghMDM56pBBZyKjkMRpeTN/nCnx2sgJC3Yl6Ro/LAhFviEFjz vOseiDxZ0NMpFlaB/It6lHu+Yjt63y3I8pVdzQbwNFZ3RuI9uZS41O9BH+N/tk89xUqz Ic2fglP0xDSGj8oBH2WM8qjy2gRuuPswd0q0+AEt1o3cWKfx6hamFjllZZNWsFKHW+zq BKsBdB0iYsJeWJ9dFisiANa9FuwRmbxXElcjvMKAuLeN5TP9tlQOlJwD8km14uzAyrAt HU+mzDgAOeW69tJjaU8HRr/QgRP13CByuuuh1GtTzQx8g5hJ/OTsukyDLNwdtp1kxiAC YDAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RMklPTn9+5DOelDz4sfltirzMz8wpJnsRMbkOrCjFTA=; b=GN5i2xTnwLuurw/kwFwa5Dln6fWpCoNTmulMZ9jBXn7x3tD1MhwiENcbV9PoS7PjZp sFMFi+wdOdj3UMWYpySoIHA8FFaEGQnUb1DogRU0a6SEUm5mIiac/G3hUPeIetZTGAuv 9tFFn1E5xakphlt2Qjj5GMdxsgTwth8Czliag33QfEYD6/U9Nc03YByF4n17dcLyVWDP pd/T32q/Yhebf5h/xNcwvi8XG18T6aI4vRMded72Otnm9aMVoOX+gUCO8ooW3LQrL1JC 4DTh9PD4xrIhakArbKMjTO2F0XOtCkAnV4VrqZteZVHsCKycdEnEdt1Li/j8UVDxtLQF g3bg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVwA75T0jRS/yj93htL21U67Uu0xhE/s+tIY0XYXRJHbZDy+CR1 5YcyzP6t0GbwN2RJlv8kBDE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzvTbLxXzXYaQA1eCLyq88YZ+BuVPfY6mCUQ2qDnc2D6Gu6aIraDPvCekX63oka7BBc9LVCBg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a415:: with SMTP id p21mr81332701plq.286.1558585459336; Wed, 22 May 2019 21:24:19 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from DreamMini2019.local (vesta.misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp. [150.46.48.154]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 194sm39206937pfb.125.2019.05.22.21.24.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 22 May 2019 21:24:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: Tak Kunihiro In-Reply-To: <83h89n80un.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 22 May 2019 09:22:40 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:159673 Archived-At: >> FWIW, a setting of >>=20 >> (5 ((shift) . 1) ((control))) >>=20=20=20=20=20 >> is IMO perfectly usable. At least with progressive scroll off. The >> only downsides are that it doesn=E2=80=99t match the way other apps work= on my >> desktop, and with a mousewheel (as opposed to a touchpad) >> shift=E2=80=90scrolling is captured by the OS and converted to horizontal >> scrolling, so shift=E2=80=90scroll does nothing anyway. > > Then I think we should make the above the default. I have no objection to it. To be consistent among platform, should mouse-wheel-progressive-speed be t? >> I still feel a default scroll amount of 1 feels much better, but it >> may just be that I=E2=80=99m used to it. > > People who want a behavior different from the default can always > customize, right? Yes. I feel different default value is better as Alan inferred; however, I think consistency among platform is important as well.