From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eshel Yaron via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#65386: [PATCH] ; Refine some 'package-vc' docstrings Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2023 19:18:48 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ledwipkb.fsf@posteo.net> Reply-To: Eshel Yaron Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18163"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 65386@debbugs.gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 27 19:20:08 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qaJQm-0004X3-1m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 19:20:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qaJQd-0005oi-F8; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 13:19:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qaJQa-0005oW-QI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 13:19:56 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qaJQa-0001fZ-3q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 13:19:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qaJQf-00017x-VQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 13:20:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eshel Yaron Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2023 17:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65386 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 65386-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65386.16931567424258 (code B ref 65386); Sun, 27 Aug 2023 17:20:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 65386) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Aug 2023 17:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46168 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qaJPh-00016R-Kg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 13:19:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.eshelyaron.com ([107.175.124.16]:40894 helo=eshelyaron.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qaJPf-00016D-Au for 65386@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 13:19:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eshelyaron.com; s=mail; t=1693156732; bh=l2ncr9iOIC1b0bWKZL1KN+eiABqj+ktFSgyXYmrUpbI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=IIOpM0IOafj8DNDblH0U3E8dr6TSUnEtU9KPwvGe9ljBEFpwflTNYN78rd66i+0lW IpfAJydUGLSOEHXdZU92F9qwfmc++jX1SZCdsnwykSSEypdJAHb00ZEHo2OD/Npu69 Wt7uF8eN1/lMFrQTTFq1BQGD6X7HHLEE5LRp+D2CWa6r7fU3hBQ5DzpLDar61TtmeR gACgzhU2Br0uw4mhbTunht/RvSBb9W1Y4DMuiAsPpFLMb4wo7ljE7EAgac3IF6Fhzh Gf7HALVqp5f5GyA4hU2Ohpou2e/zQWwBQDFE+TecBWwdqd9ffsXxCA+ipmzN1+FR1I Vp2bqN6tNHWcw== In-Reply-To: <87ledwipkb.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Sun, 27 Aug 2023 13:26:44 +0000") X-Hashcash: 1:20:230827:philipk@posteo.net::aDq4KgP/HtKj3PAy:0vLc X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:268575 Archived-At: Hi Philip, Philip Kaludercic writes: > close 65386 30.1 > quit I got a message saying that this bug is now closed, but I don't see that the relevant patches have been applied. Just to make sure, is this intentional? Thanks, Eshel