From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11104: 24.0.94; (void-function make-local-hook): Update NEWS maybe? Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:05:35 +0800 Message-ID: References: <81zkb1kera.fsf@gmail.com> <87ehsdbyo0.fsf@altern.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1332929219 11817 80.91.229.3 (28 Mar 2012 10:06:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:06:59 +0000 (UTC) To: 11104@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 28 12:06:57 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SCpmG-0005nF-3V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:06:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37068 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCpmF-0008Tz-Dd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:06:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40861) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCpmC-0008To-7D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:06:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCpm6-0000TY-2H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:06:47 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35511) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCpm5-0000TS-VU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:06:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SCqGP-0008R0-T0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:38:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <81zkb1kera.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Leo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11104 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.133293106932405 (code B ref -1); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:38:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Mar 2012 10:37:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42343 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SCqGC-0008Qb-3A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:37:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56242) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SCqFv-0008Py-Nt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:37:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCplV-0000PH-0q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:06:10 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:60978) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCplU-0000PC-Td for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:06:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40734) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCplO-0008NR-VW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:06:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCplI-0000Nh-O4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:05:58 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43842) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCplI-0000NX-Gy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:05:52 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SCplG-0004t5-OR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:05:50 +0200 Original-Received: from 119.255.41.67 ([119.255.41.67]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:05:50 +0200 Original-Received: from sdl.web by 119.255.41.67 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:05:50 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 119.255.41.67 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAElBMVEUAAAAAAP+LRRP0pGC+ vr7///+7mT1iAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB9cBBwMO DhglKe4AAAEsSURBVCjPbZNBboQwDEV/Cd4X9QJRThApmn0XYW+Jyf2v0m+HhqDBgiAe9rcTG7QH w/1Vn2Ar8gBb/ocywSN3qK9T3z4eFDB4eApocBpeBs1RSykoJd8gQcm8pGmHXFso3ajnmsqV0TnY DQkOfXUfN5NwaI7AWTVOyEhcu1aHmdWItHddUVUcUgUBCkitu8V6ditHVOVdqzl2EQ1ZVGTbdK0V 7cqn8vWzoU5Q/bF9Y/Y0cRU1xwkys5dJ+Dt6pBDWifcNQml8Gh2JVmPSoQzo7en0grswkxrUGYJ7 0hSxxAGr7ZMwYcHIzprpi7TENEE1xtiYxixRlCfPBsUUrwHD7uGIwATrbnODJcVrPpVn3hxiGloe m/S+z3CtuzUSMo83N4DPH+F0evwR3P4A2k+75838OKQAAAAASUVORK5CYII= User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (Mac OS X 10.6.8) Cancel-Lock: sha1:MhCGOoQxkRYWMN4F9vpM1Kj47uI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:58228 Archived-At: On 2012-03-28 04:02 +0800, Bastien wrote: > Adding the defalias above is a more generalized backward-compatibility > fix that other packages than Gnus would be aware of. Should we add it > to Emacs? Why add it back? I think we should let those packages do it in their own name space. Leo