From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: peder@klingenberg.no (Peder O. Klingenberg) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25708: 25.1.91; Allow users to inhibit printing for 'emacsclient -c -t' Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 09:58:43 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83efytpmj4.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1487581157 15076 195.159.176.226 (20 Feb 2017 08:59:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 08:59:17 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (darwin) Cc: 25708@debbugs.gnu.org, alexhutcheson@google.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 20 09:59:09 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cfjoK-0003O8-RI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 09:59:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36765 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cfjoQ-0002Bh-N5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 03:59:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52921) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cfjoK-0002BP-1S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 03:59:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cfjoE-0004Zy-KG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 03:59:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48656) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cfjoE-0004Zu-GH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 03:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cfjoE-00017w-8f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 03:59:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: peder@klingenberg.no (Peder O. Klingenberg) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 08:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25708 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 25708-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25708.14875811414325 (code B ref 25708); Mon, 20 Feb 2017 08:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25708) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2017 08:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46855 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cfjoC-00017h-Ty for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 03:59:01 -0500 Original-Received: from tarrant.klingenberg.no ([80.91.231.253]:60835) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cfjoB-00017Y-6s for 25708@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 03:58:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [94.102.36.20] (helo=modesty.localdomain) by tarrant.klingenberg.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1cfjny-00057y-TM; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 09:58:55 +0100 Original-Received: by modesty.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 502) id 60B7C1711EC8; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 09:58:43 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <83efytpmj4.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 20 Feb 2017 05:29:51 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:129570 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Thanks, but I think this warrants a separate command-line option, or > maybe a special argument to --quiet. Otherwise, it would be an > incompatible change in behavior. Ok. I'll take a stab at implementing that later today. -- ...Peder...