From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: James P. Ascher Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22426: 24.5; Crash from full-screen in OS X for emacs 24.5 Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 18:24:21 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1453677922 9561 80.91.229.3 (24 Jan 2016 23:25:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 23:25:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22426@debbugs.gnu.org To: Anders Lindgren Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 25 00:25:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aNU1u-0003NZ-Fz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 00:25:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33727 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aNU1t-0003L7-U2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 18:25:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58136) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aNU1p-0003KX-S1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 18:25:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aNU1m-0005Vr-Lf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 18:25:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47070) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aNU1m-0005Vd-IX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 18:25:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aNU1m-0000yK-FS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 18:25:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: James P. Ascher Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 23:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22426 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22426-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22426.14536778713670 (code B ref 22426); Sun, 24 Jan 2016 23:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22426) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2016 23:24:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35285 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aNU1H-0000x8-Da for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 18:24:31 -0500 Original-Received: from iron3.mail.virginia.edu ([128.143.2.240]:53176) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aNU1F-0000wv-Sk for 22426@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 18:24:30 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DEAQDyW6VWlC7AVdFdGQEBAQEPAQEBAYNciUSzeB6DEIJhAoEePBABAQEBAQEBEQEBAQEHCwsJHzCEQgEBAQIBEmcFCwsOEyUPASQBBQEcBjWHcQigPoExPjGWVQGDKgEBAQEBBQEBAQEBARoKhimEbIkGBY4eiFiFRoo4hnCFYYZrI4V0MIENN4I9gXWICAEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A0DEAQDyW6VWlC7AVdFdGQEBAQEPAQEBAYNciUSzeB6DEIJhAoEePBABAQEBAQEBEQEBAQEHCwsJHzCEQgEBAQIBEmcFCwsOEyUPASQBBQEcBjWHcQigPoExPjGWVQGDKgEBAQEBBQEBAQEBARoKhimEbIkGBY4eiFiFRoo4hnCFYYZrI4V0MIENN4I9gXWICAEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,342,1449550800"; d="scan'208";a="270501294" X-Sender-IP: 209.85.192.46 Original-Received: from mail-qg0-f46.google.com ([209.85.192.46]) by iron3.mail.virginia.edu with ESMTP; 24 Jan 2016 18:24:23 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id 6so96857889qgy.1 for <22426@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 15:24:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=YI1EY6RPlgsNidJOTwYtemU2DqYazdMWhjC0DaPeiPI=; b=KXiVe8gKMwWorFT13LAv0BMe2ZHR0MMYLPp9yfjBzMk4HbV1e9bONLHJAjt00gjMNg 0PhQ5MQWFIRsurm60N8oESWBiiYbMaqKtTTxE9P+1yQOm1Tc3xzlFQt14WkLgnKv0iE9 zzRLEC1YckLPLrtImvY5YkY2Pr0UQSV6n+UxIjW8jvZIXnw8C49ISr6IyitpDlYAxDYT F+w1v4o73kWtSDQTIxzMGPXbBI/+vNaTMamlKmRvZTlN0g8qEAH2BhuxKBJhCyc90FBW jbMn9M4xmjuZWiX37LTvHE+VQ15BjTicInxMSEswxrk7TVxS4xSDmch8kYijGEv645ZP 2sNA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORNR+5HTFGAKPqTr5QlPHCmeEHQl8cCIv534yrhFgxz3/ez3YOBLg6VoQhTuDa2wjvVfZ1TG66M72qe/OzVMuD5n85/lUC90VedKQU61Kj+guNLjWTZnJcM/l7wL6ZtLqyMw2P59nZwAjLYuM8= X-Received: by 10.140.141.69 with SMTP id 66mr19042597qhn.68.1453677863775; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 15:24:23 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.141.69 with SMTP id 66mr19042589qhn.68.1453677863597; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 15:24:23 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Grumpys-MacBook-Pro.local.gmail.com (c-73-171-1-249.hsd1.va.comcast.net. [73.171.1.249]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l18sm7685019qgd.36.2016.01.24.15.24.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 24 Jan 2016 15:24:22 -0800 (PST) User-agent: mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 24.5.1 In-reply-to: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:111950 Archived-At: > I don't see this behaviour, however I run 10.10. > > There has been some work done in this area -- Can you try this on > development version of 25.1 and see if the problems exists there? (A > "nightie" from http://emacsforosx.com/builds would do.) It seems that 25 fixes the problem. The bug does NOT occur with Emacs-2016-01-24_01-41-01-8cdb9ac0fb060366bc823de84ecdba258716addb-universal.dmg from that address. I also checked the build of 24 up there ( Emacs-24.5-1-universal.dmg ) and it still has the same bug, but I can confirm that the bug is gone in that nightly build of 25. I'm totally happy to help debug the problem in 24, as it would be an excuse to understand the development process better, but I'm also happy to wait for 25.1 to become stable, which seems imminent. Say the word and I'll figure out how to compile a debugging version of 24 (I just managed to codesign gdb), but I suspect that energy may be better spent on 25. With appreciation, -James