From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7645: 23.2; ido commands failed to execute if there is some killed buffer Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 16:28:04 +0800 Message-ID: References: <87y66cyadm.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303893465 22555 80.91.229.12 (27 Apr 2011 08:37:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Abaw , 7645@debbugs.gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 27 10:37:40 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QF0Fe-0007GU-Iz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:37:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48454 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QF0Fd-0008OK-Qm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:37:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33846) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QF0Fa-0008O7-M8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:37:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QF0FZ-0001ak-Mx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:37:34 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55681) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QF0FZ-0001ac-Hn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:37:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QF07K-0000Vs-Em; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Leo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7645 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7645-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7645.13038929221935 (code B ref 7645); Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7645) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2011 08:28:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QF06z-0000V9-CE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:28:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pv0-f172.google.com ([74.125.83.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QF06e-0000UU-BO for 7645@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:28:40 -0400 Original-Received: by pvh1 with SMTP id 1so1176792pvh.3 for <7645@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 01:28:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=ri1zdZP0ztGG/6ISfArMzIJRxBtn7bhAVEXWaZeNc3E=; b=StCW8iQDbcOuYaV9NU1pcgNGnxCLSG2wAeVJPGFi9Lcsy/6HDuQaiFP63/m3t6XgXQ lV12Val3w+XxkCg8xOPC6XEAbFtkk1SKh3Bd9K+HCrrMuHX9ud6jhvybEA9F8RLrREIY 76c/lgxO1K6ba5bJ6qi0w17ukIIQN0FGenPSI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=J/Y19ap1aAxNLOSkwfbHhC5HdDbUB/IALoO3PGJcJd9zAc74aT8Rvw2EfL3LC0kLHN fnqv/92ghTAevuQ/bWF5As+G0WKcmEFLpI28R+qD7fP/6SkOYlGw/VSiBryfpRcMiGnA l5IM0C3hfXeEVBF1CTdBACd+g0NMupxMwven8= Original-Received: by 10.68.71.193 with SMTP id x1mr1739984pbu.429.1303892894282; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 01:28:14 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from th041117.ip.tsinghua.edu.cn (th041080.ip.tsinghua.edu.cn [59.66.41.80]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z3sm421284pbk.55.2011.04.27.01.28.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 27 Apr 2011 01:28:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y66cyadm.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Sat, 22 Jan 2011 15:03:01 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3.50 (Mac OS X 10.6.7) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:29:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:46028 Archived-At: On 2011-01-23 04:03 +0800, Chong Yidong wrote: > Abaw writes: > >> [buffer-list] rarely(less than 1 time per month) returns killed >> buffers, but it does. Maybe some of my used packages referenced the >> killed buffers. > > If so, that would be a bug. `buffer-list' returns the contents of a > list of live buffers maintained internally by Emacs. When a buffer is > killed, it should be simultaneously removed from this internal list. I have seen this bug too due to (buffer-list t) returning killed buffers. Unfortunately this isn't easy to reproduce. Leo