From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Liu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45610: 27.1; =?UTF-8?Q?Symbol=E2=80=99s?= function definition is void: seq-concatenate Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 13:39:03 +0800 Message-ID: References: <83v9cfecab.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1n3e7ps.fsf@gnu.org> <83eej3e1xi.fsf@gnu.org> <874kjz8fgj.fsf@gnus.org> <83eej2c9bf.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16475"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (macOS 10.14.6) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 45610@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 04 06:41:07 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kwIc7-00040V-0t for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 06:41:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57392 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwIc6-0002mu-2j for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 00:41:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49594) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwIb4-0002Dh-JH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 00:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55903) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwIb4-0000aE-B1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 00:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kwIb4-0001q5-7D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 00:40:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Leo Liu Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 05:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45610 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45610-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45610.16097387557010 (code B ref 45610); Mon, 04 Jan 2021 05:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45610) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2021 05:39:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39215 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kwIaJ-0001oz-BA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 00:39:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]:44007) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kwIaH-0001ok-Tx for 45610@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 00:39:14 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-f175.google.com with SMTP id x12so13918445plr.10 for <45610@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Jan 2021 21:39:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=vUm/DBWaKfuC7gU2PsOMZquoIX7LXJycX9toHswlGSA=; b=WF8+SSG/yS0kH/PyxzO7wetzaOkAHOgXOR8KGCeN3Y/ukRAriIdcnTT0i+UkLemuca 4RUK7cp9v3GdiSgKCRm2MyuV2HynGKiOLVC+E2+9FRV869UCR873N5gZkCmvgtWR8Gjo XOgdluVNhrneByrJwXDhCtGPTrhr+S0qhsy9iZ5OVzeMZYrT3mhkgIq42e6JRggJzyM8 9qytbmfhaBDv3Vim3rupCuwXm6lkCecYaNaDLJ1BoJ2OzhkEYrB5fO9Tyl3a677fajnH UohypkPl7SHo08grCozvQ56Jt0T7JWk33Y5oHnDoO0x6UDTxlU0uBHRSl97BHr9re/Z8 cYDQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=vUm/DBWaKfuC7gU2PsOMZquoIX7LXJycX9toHswlGSA=; b=eWoOr6wi2RwvU1vfDRpFT2/wRSOQlZAkWLxblO119Yackb6QJffGCqFSvwtMAtiwqo RJAlVxNgRQA5S9svLJsIk+k/VQ0/paBNrENGbl5y51nx5wJTCHymaZ93bhRdR5y+31cz s+l846RUC+gc31Mkktik3CJHCLSkNwfMUjKRySj1iNQuMbeqv9FQn1pOrlSGNPFh93K3 4QD/lqDAlJSeB/e2A+vgD5Fn45xXFoi6HrRb78Ot1uaHp8UoxFi71UwvkQBfJYILWyrP lS9qsz71d74LwscXsT2gLqqn2xXYEFJIMNZzMbXHyJsPq44OzIvfCCGEv1amV5BAm8gS sJqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5315CHaIxBfYokEY7G/iQO8UWQaW15Opz0HRizJQmO9f6x1OoXar FXiOJgBtR9JWpvQb5A+fN+0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxkiEPa7IszWQjDXrRMnmMkUBe6GeWi+oDD+YuGcofzSaSK2Yj3jyamZN/6+CxapbMhhTjXWA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1918:: with SMTP id mp24mr27580351pjb.45.1609738748099; Sun, 03 Jan 2021 21:39:08 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Zeuss-MacBook-Air.local ([112.211.1.191]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ck20sm20224719pjb.20.2021.01.03.21.39.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 03 Jan 2021 21:39:07 -0800 (PST) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAG1BMVEUAAAA9Cgm3Hx1WWFWA gn+WmJWsrqv4+vcCAwCRl2MkAAAAAXRSTlMAQObYZgAAAAFiS0dEAIgFHUgAAAAJcEhZcwAAAYoA AAGKATOXMFgAAAAHdElNRQfXAQwDNR+ZJmElAAABIklEQVQoz22SPW+DQAyGWUq65qasd9PNUSX4 AZHK2C1rJy5jpDS4IwRVup9dn7GNafpKIPPgzztXFSujqq1eM2n8h22oMkvxI/i9C97kRfMRUN55 dS3BrsAwBXUtMLAO4lryh8kTjOxKpQNniNxAgZOEe4bZwsDTFhKdqZRLNII4OQNHhEuq/RMkm6Cj TnnEA/fk0BorcYn5qA3oaeAxbaBOLrX+9G48NZ2Fzc2tzDM8Q+tMypEOqYHh8mAWaaK3U/cDMOT5 aMZMABgPXc7zPMs1A8DXO756GFJ/4fMEq47hTsAdn5avoxZ4ywl0c2w4Flu2Ybeyb3S+EqxX2DYA H8veJGEDTnHnrXvRaPyt+2kSfK6rfBZ2tUtfP/mR+pR6sX8BUZ/cDV7tvkoAAAAASUVORK5CYII= In-Reply-To: <83eej2c9bf.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 03 Jan 2021 17:46:28 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:197288 Archived-At: On 2021-01-03 17:46 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > In your opinion, is this better than my suggestion? I didn't comment much on this point last night. Adding (require 'seq) to cl-concatenate is probably the least favourable because it also defeats the purpose of the `inline' cl-proclaim. Adding autoload cookie for seq-concatenate is simple though not the cleanest, IOW, we have the workings of cl-concatenate in some situations depend on the autoload cookie. But this is not uncommon practice. Given the dilemma we are in I wonder if the considerations for `inline' cl-concatenate in the first place are no longer applicable.