From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10428: 24.0.92; Please remove unnecessary alias `which-func-mode` Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 09:27:32 +0800 Message-ID: References: <014129A6420D41638EDA8023DEE4C0BC@us.oracle.com> <4F0393D2.2030106@dancol.org> <4F03965C.7090401@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325640529 2779 80.91.229.12 (4 Jan 2012 01:28:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 01:28:49 +0000 (UTC) To: 10428@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 04 02:28:45 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RiFen-0003u2-7T for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 02:28:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50696 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RiFem-0002dw-Ih for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:28:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34201) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RiFek-0002dr-CR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:28:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RiFej-0000xX-0C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:28:42 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36159) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RiFei-0000xT-Uu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:28:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RiFhx-0008H6-UI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:32:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <014129A6420D41638EDA8023DEE4C0BC@us.oracle.com> Resent-From: Leo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 01:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10428 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.132564067431743 (code B ref -1); Wed, 04 Jan 2012 01:32:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2012 01:31:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RiFhC-0008Fw-GQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:31:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RiFhB-0008Fq-8N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:31:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RiFdu-0000ez-Sr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:27:51 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:56551) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RiFdu-0000ev-RQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:27:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34094) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RiFdt-0002dX-VW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:27:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RiFdt-0000ei-2d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:27:49 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:53893) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RiFds-0000ee-Rs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:27:49 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RiFdr-0003bC-Fj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 02:27:47 +0100 Original-Received: from 123.114.37.7 ([123.114.37.7]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 02:27:47 +0100 Original-Received: from sdl.web by 123.114.37.7 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 02:27:47 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 123.114.37.7 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACkAAAApAQAAAACAGz1bAAABKElEQVQYlWNg3NIt5FDPUPt7 4+X79Qyucz5/ugik+L2PBgKpyphaIK921q23QDnG0NBQoMr/vaWl9f8ZLL78uPv5PwN7RETfzXoG jhmFz27XM0RXmpuY/WfY+fv0Mc56BvFybfXA/wwL5t/wF61n2PU59axXPcOVzbmSW/8zrNt1benC /ww70hqUU/4zKCtrT9jwn8FhwynbufUMendE2aLqGRpdX9al1zM8eh17lKeeQcTMrdD5P8P3j/YT Q/8zXHSb7p1Qz/C4OM2JuZ7hgtI7K6AjqsMnf8j4z8C6xG1tw3+GqpqvsVn/GTzmpD9j/8/wP/oZ S/l/Bka+QO/g/wy15ueeFQL9N1O8mPU/g+umV3t1gdT0/1bTgHLqYVeXAlWKpMWt+w8Az82C9nHf X0cAAAAASUVORK5CYII= User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3.50 (Mac OS X 10.6.8) Cancel-Lock: sha1:A3EP24xQi446IhaqjNkh42qUWH8= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:32:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:55393 Archived-At: On 2012-01-04 09:03 +0800, Juanma Barranquero wrote: >> change what they physically type isn't only acceptable, but desired: >> this way, we raise awareness of the new name. > > Sometimes two names are just alternatives. And which-func-mode is shorter. For such a public-facing command, an alias only creates confusion. I have literally checked out which-func-mode because it showed up in completion and I was curious how it differs from which-function-mode. Leo