From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Julien Danjou Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24273: 25.1.50; Unexpected return value from `color-name-to-rgb' Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 14:32:23 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87wpjbydp4.fsf@gmail.com> <1471687906.14623.0@smtp.gmail.com> <83h9afd675.fsf@gnu.org> <87inuv4par.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83fupzd47j.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1471696401 13439 195.159.176.226 (20 Aug 2016 12:33:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 12:33:21 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Cc: Andreas Schwab , simenheg@gmail.com, 24273@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 20 14:33:16 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bb5Se-00037v-0w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 14:33:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32930 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bb5Sb-0001c5-D9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 08:33:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46599) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bb5SU-0001Uv-Uz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 08:33:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bb5SQ-00028t-NK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 08:33:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37098) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bb5SQ-00028p-KA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 08:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bb5SQ-0002sL-95 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 08:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Julien Danjou Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 12:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24273 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24273-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24273.147169635411018 (code B ref 24273); Sat, 20 Aug 2016 12:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24273) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Aug 2016 12:32:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34810 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bb5Ry-0002re-2W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 08:32:34 -0400 Original-Received: from prometheus.naquadah.org ([91.121.37.122]:45499 helo=mail.naquadah.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bb5Rw-0002rQ-8Z for 24273@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 08:32:33 -0400 Original-Received: from abydos (ARennes-654-1-45-241.w81-53.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.53.172.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.naquadah.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1F0EE0096; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 14:32:25 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83fupzd47j.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 20 Aug 2016 15:17:52 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:122422 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 20 2016, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I don't think I follow you. What does 8 bits per color have to do > with this, and how do you know the OP has 8 bits per color on his > display? > > FWIW, on my display, I get (65535 65535 65535) for both expressions. I get (65280 65280 65280) for both on my display. The problem is that `color-name-to-rgb' expect to find the brightest point by calling (color-values "#ffffff") whereas it seems in this case it's less bright than "white". Is that something possible? What kind of system are you running Simen? =2D-=20 Julien Danjou ;; Free Software hacker ;; https://julien.danjou.info --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXuE3XAAoJEGEbqVCLeKXCL/8QAJqyI8LNu7JgOoF0v4Jd05li 6z1HonO+rgff+rhd5KiED6DfPYPeRFHyTZcHZSoCmsZW1jaZT4nREqEYAEij3+cH ahuWgAZCsN+33blnpTAQYUulBbwMPo9Qo+D4RG2eGgyl8VtRP2IhL8GE5oYaolO1 2VtlDRY6NTAb4+56FLzIZ5XBlN2vVD628k+T+cscJgZvrp0mtV9m5fvIezaL7YPT m77T1DmSIX99nbdWATm+8H0+hHRdt9Ia56P74J7HMuk9WgkEN+/96+ejtAjKOiKx E7pCvEvckZg7jU33pTbQ3z7O4f7OzM7DRXCtcq13LSOfPrP4fUZ4b04lj00iG5i5 O4d5PC0b2LeYRPnoEyB9Estk2UOB7IXGRx87A8doQA7JTdqi2Rtupj0FWt+kCMBU R6h8w7PDZqav3/MgKyO11vwCWFP2+RakXxQW1vOMZePPxq3zkkME+rGX1+0Vi5Wv i6QNPn5chmO6JCjYCfDpvddCFLezWsdl8WblhXo6D/wQl1ryV87Ukjw0WM/ltyn5 6Qacfo4hMPIS/vZyo85qhlMslQHzgkUxZaCvm4Q2zEXj7xuECDtKHvLiFKzpWfEa 37M2UWASiGqrYKgrmRG1PBi2g5Spe5sjQm8TtfsB+G9K04k8g1tzCCCmA4uneRqP oqqjOFxT8UVaPeqUilnk =FJui -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--