unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Al Haji-Ali <abdo.haji.ali@gmail.com>
To: 74536@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#74536: 30.0.50; undocumented box behaviour in faces
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:34:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m01pyzumy6.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)


The output of the following code is

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(progn
  (fundamental-mode)
  (insert (concat "\n"
                  (propertize "hello" 'face '(:box (:line-width (3 . 0) :color "red")))
                  (propertize " again" 'face '(:box (:line-width (3 . 0) :color "yellow")))
                  (propertize " other" 'face '(:box (:line-width (3 . 0) :color "green"))))
          "\n"))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---


|hello again other|

where the left border is red and the right one is green and the yellow border is completely hidden. Having negative line-width produces the same output.

It seems that one cannot have multiple adjacent borders unless one has some text in between without a border, like this
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(progn
  (fundamental-mode)
  (insert (concat "\n"
                  (propertize "hello" 'face '(:box (:line-width (3 . 0) :color "red")))
                  " "
                  (propertize " again" 'face '(:box (:line-width (3 . 0) :color "yellow")))
                  (propertize " othe " 'face '(:box (:line-width (3 . 0) :color "green"))))
          "\n"))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

produces

|hello| | again other|

with (red, red, yellow, green) borders.

I find this behaviour, if intended, sometimes helpful as it allows one to have a one-sided border. Though it would be helpful if the exact mechanism is documented.

In any case, I was also originally expecting, and wanting, an output like this
|hello| again | other|

with `(red, yellow, green, green)` and no text in between, but it seems there is no way to achieve such output? Is that correct?

-- Al





             reply	other threads:[~2024-11-25 19:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-25 19:34 Al Haji-Ali [this message]
2024-11-25 19:44 ` bug#74536: 30.0.50; undocumented box behaviour in faces Eli Zaretskii
2024-11-25 21:08   ` Al Haji-Ali

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m01pyzumy6.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=abdo.haji.ali@gmail.com \
    --cc=74536@debbugs.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).