From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17187: 24.3.50.1 open-dribble-file stores pw Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 22:05:10 -0400 Message-ID: References: <533EED70.9090709@easy-emacs.de> <53408E4B.9060605@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1396749973 6568 80.91.229.3 (6 Apr 2014 02:06:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2014 02:06:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17187@debbugs.gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 06 04:06:06 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WWcTF-0005r2-UT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Apr 2014 04:06:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56549 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WWcTF-0006F7-EE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 22:06:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39206) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WWcTC-0006Cb-VF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 22:06:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WWcTC-0000bT-4L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 22:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36092) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WWcTC-0000bP-1V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 22:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WWcTB-0000Hp-Qb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 22:06:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 02:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17187 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17187-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17187.13967499131039 (code B ref 17187); Sun, 06 Apr 2014 02:06:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17187) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Apr 2014 02:05:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37274 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WWcSO-0000Gh-HN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 22:05:12 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:44742) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WWcSN-0000GY-0O for 17187@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 22:05:11 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WWcSM-0005ln-Gf; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 22:05:10 -0400 X-Spook: world domination ISEC benelux COSCO Skipjack FSF X-Ran: nB9>e[5Kx.z*ws]>30R&x$X"Y6{ci+Wt*7Sr|ZF(lU[]pm13gteg_8!'\Ut^z01Fl6%6Aj X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <53408E4B.9060605@dancol.org> (Daniel Colascione's message of "Sat, 05 Apr 2014 16:14:19 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:87789 Archived-At: Daniel Colascione wrote: > That's racy. What about using fchmod and falling back to post-open chmod > for systems that don't have fchmod? I'm no C coder, please feel free to improve it. But IIUC it's been argued that we don't need to guard against malicious intent here, only user oversight.