From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bill Meier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: [PATCH] nt/gmake,defs, nt/nmake.defs Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:14:43 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <200801152218.m0FMIjGx041292@member.newsguy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200673231 26418 80.91.229.12 (18 Jan 2008 16:20:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:20:31 +0000 (UTC) To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 18 17:20:48 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JFtxX-00014b-NJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:20:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JFtx8-0008Ne-Ny for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:20:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JFtx3-0008NQ-4T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:20:17 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JFtwy-0008Da-Jr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:20:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JFtwy-0008DM-Fr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:20:12 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFtwy-0003eE-0W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:20:12 -0500 Original-Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JFtwo-0008AO-Hf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:20:04 +0000 Original-Received: from accelerate.att.net ([67.72.98.81]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: from wmeier by accelerate.att.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:20:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 67.72.98.96 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071127 Firefox/2.0.0.11) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:17367 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii gnu.org> writes: > If this is important to you, figure out how to test for the support of > the -p option in configure.bat, and then use the result of such a test > at "make install" time. OK..... A question before I submit a revised patch: Should I diff the patch against EMACS_22_BASE ? MAIN (HEAD) ? or both ? (Is it something like bug fixes to EMACS_22_BASE and enhancements to MAIN ?) Thanks Bill Meier