From: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
To: 13523@debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Chong Yidong <cyd@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#13523: 24.2.92; [regression] mark-active
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 03:06:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <kvobgg2uj1.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2zk01hceu.fsf@gmail.com> (Leo Liu's message of "Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:03:53 +0800")
So IIUC the issue can be summarized as:
down-mouse-1 runs mouse-drag-region
mouse-1 runs mouse-set-point
mouse-drag-region calls mouse-drag-track.
Since 2010-07-03 (I think), this unconditionally pushes mark.
It then uses track-mouse to watch for further mouse events.
If at the end, point has not moved and the last event was
mouse-set-point or mouse-set-region, it deactivates and pops the mark.
Otherwise it assumes it is handling a multi-click event (since
2010-07-05), and does not deactivate mark.
The result is that if you bind mouse-1 to something other than
mouse-set-point, and leave down-mouse-1 alone, then after a mouse-1 click
the mark stays active (unless you specifically deactivate it).
Examples can be seen with image-dired and rst-toc-mode, which both bind
mouse-1 but not down-mouse-1. In both cases, mouse-1 clicks leave the
mouse active. It doesn't seem to matter in either case, but probably is
not intended.
Is the intention that people bind down-mouse-1 as well/instead of
mouse-1, or that things bound to mouse-1 deactivate mark, or can the
multi-click detection be changed somehow to avoid this?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-23 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-22 8:03 bug#13523: 24.2.92; [regression] mark-active Leo Liu
2013-01-22 8:28 ` Dmitry Gutov
2013-01-22 8:59 ` Leo Liu
2013-01-23 8:06 ` Glenn Morris [this message]
2013-01-23 12:48 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-01-27 2:16 ` Glenn Morris
2013-01-28 1:33 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-01-30 2:00 ` Glenn Morris
2013-01-31 2:47 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-01-31 3:34 ` Glenn Morris
2013-01-31 7:21 ` Glenn Morris
2013-01-31 7:48 ` Glenn Morris
2013-01-31 14:47 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-02-01 23:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-01-24 1:20 ` Leo Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=kvobgg2uj1.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rgm@gnu.org \
--cc=13523@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=cyd@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).