From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10125: 24.0.91; package.el (org): Macros in tar packages & order of byte compilation Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:21:28 -0500 Message-ID: References: <81pqgh90sp.fsf@gmail.com> <81ipm9l9kd.fsf@gmail.com> <87r50w47o3.fsf@gnu.org> <4vcq8xbby.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1322248965 18809 80.91.229.12 (25 Nov 2011 19:22:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 19:22:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10125@debbugs.gnu.org, Chong Yidong , stelian.iancu@gmail.com, Jambunathan K To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 25 20:22:40 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RU1M8-00007b-En for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 20:22:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40121 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RU1M5-0000bP-16 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:22:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43490) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RU1Lv-0000AH-VH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:22:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RU1Lv-0002Uc-43 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:22:27 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37153) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RU1Lt-0002UA-8R; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:22:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RU1NS-0000Ke-CI; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:24:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 19:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10125 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,org-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10125-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10125.13222489911216 (code B ref 10125); Fri, 25 Nov 2011 19:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10125) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2011 19:23:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RU1Mc-0000JY-HQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:23:11 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RU1Ma-0000JQ-Fq for 10125@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:23:09 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RU1Kz-0000w0-7X; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:21:29 -0500 X-Spook: SAFE Al-Qaeda plutonium radar SRI virus mailbomb Plame X-Ran: 8D#,46z0qJ!{#3);#etNsT*4.'CS< (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:15:45 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:24:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54326 Archived-At: Glenn Morris wrote: > the package has defined. Though you would have to trust the package not > to do anything nasty. Of course, you already have to trust it since byte-compiling can run arbitrary code.