From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7302: vcdiff using "sccs get" rather than "get" breaks bitkeeper usage. Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:19:06 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300196671 25365 80.91.229.12 (15 Mar 2011 13:44:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7302@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 15 14:44:25 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PzUXx-00017h-E0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:44:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43969 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PzUR1-0004H1-MF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:37:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57713 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PzUQp-0004EY-6x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:37:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PzUQn-0002bz-Gc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:37:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49503) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PzUQn-0002bt-Ek for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:37:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PzUAN-0001CC-3h; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:20:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7302 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 7302-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7302.13001951544535 (code B ref 7302); Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7302) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Mar 2011 13:19:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PzU9a-0001B6-Me for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:19:14 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PzU9Y-0001At-SD for 7302@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:19:13 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAOcDf01FxIRf/2dsb2JhbACmDnjCTYViBJVb X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.62,322,1297054800"; d="scan'208";a="96587799" Original-Received: from 69-196-132-95.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.132.95]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 15 Mar 2011 09:19:07 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id BA0BD58CB1; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:19:06 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Tue, 15 Mar 2011 02:26:04 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:20:03 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:45029 Archived-At: >> I have tried that patch and can confirm that it works for me. > [...] >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Stefan Monnier [mailto:monnier@iro.umontreal.ca] > [...] >> Can you confirm that the patch below works for you? > I don't think this was ever installed; would you like to install it and > close this report? Actually, I don't really like the fix I suggested, and I have the impression that it only covers a small part of the underlying problem. Stefan