From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:57:09 -0400 Message-ID: References: <500039B7.8050106@cs.ucla.edu> <5002C895.4080400@cs.ucla.edu> <500499C7.20902@cs.ucla.edu> <83txx79jgx.fsf@gnu.org> <500E0657.4050604@cs.ucla.edu> <500EA6F7.6080609@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1343167048 24411 80.91.229.3 (24 Jul 2012 21:57:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 21:57:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11935@debbugs.gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 24 23:57:27 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Stn6c-0000ox-KB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:57:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45315 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Stn6c-0000Vw-1K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:57:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33638) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Stn6X-0000Vp-VK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:57:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Stn6W-0007Uq-TX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:57:21 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56035) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Stn6W-0007Uk-QN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:57:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1StnD0-000700-4X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 18:04:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 22:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11935 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 11935-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11935.134316743726891 (code B ref 11935); Tue, 24 Jul 2012 22:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11935) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jul 2012 22:03:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37348 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1StnCu-0006zg-W0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 18:03:57 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:46635) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1StnCt-0006za-QN for 11935@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 18:03:56 -0400 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q6OLvAr8016022; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:57:10 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id BCF64AE2FE; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:57:09 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <500EA6F7.6080609@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Tue, 24 Jul 2012 06:45:27 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.5 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered SUBJ_END_DOT_WORDS=0.5, RV4289=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4289> : streams <789863> : uri <1173943> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:62354 Archived-At: > Sure, attached; this assumes the earlier patch in > > has been applied and merged. I'm not sure I understand what it does. It seems to define XLI first as a macro then as a function. Is that right? If so, why is it any better than using only the macro form? Stefan