From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12583: latest org-mode changes exposes bug in `comment-forward'in newcomment.el Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 12:48:40 -0400 Message-ID: References: <91FE7CF1DA974412A922D439CF16A994@us.oracle.com> <8A74257275DC479D86CE39485F0D5FB7@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1349542190 24432 80.91.229.3 (6 Oct 2012 16:49:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 16:49:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12583@debbugs.gnu.org, 'Le Wang' To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 06 18:49:55 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TKXZa-0000EN-Og for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 18:49:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49388 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKXZV-00009j-18 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 12:49:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35121) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKXZS-00009S-Hg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 12:49:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKXZR-0001dV-Kg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 12:49:46 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48160) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKXZR-0001dR-HQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 12:49:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TKXZi-0000kW-Bb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 12:50:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 16:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12583 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12583-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12583.13495421422792 (code B ref 12583); Sat, 06 Oct 2012 16:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12583) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2012 16:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58400 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TKXYi-0000ih-TM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 12:49:01 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:47127) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TKXYg-0000iY-7q for 12583@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 12:48:59 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q96GmerU019579; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 12:48:40 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 98C8EB40A1; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 12:48:40 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <8A74257275DC479D86CE39485F0D5FB7@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 6 Oct 2012 09:37:48 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:65276 Archived-At: >> > For my own use, I wonder whether I should be calling `c-n-v' before >> > I make use of `comment-search-forward'. >> Yes, you should. > OK, thanks. Please consider providing specific guidelines about this, > somewhere. I think the guideline "commands that use comment-* functions should call c-n-v first" is a good approximation. > OK, so it was only for a transition. Presumably that means that some > of those autoloads will be removed at some point. Except that I don't know how to mark obsolete the auto-loading of a variable, so the transition would be just as abrupt now as it would have been then. I guess we can remove autoloads one at a time and see when someone screams. Stefan