From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12721: 24.2; package-installed-p behavior on emacs startup Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 22:43:58 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1351305895 31645 80.91.229.3 (27 Oct 2012 02:44:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 02:44:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12721-done@debbugs.gnu.org, kostafey@gmail.com To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 27 04:45:03 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TRwOV-0006oJ-8x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 04:45:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40374 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRwOM-0001iY-SJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 22:44:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44141) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRwOJ-0001iD-UU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 22:44:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRwOJ-0005Ce-2v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 22:44:51 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53311) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRwOI-0005CY-W4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 22:44:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TRwQQ-0004ap-H9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 22:47:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 02:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12721 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 12721-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D12721.135130597617605 (code D ref 12721); Sat, 27 Oct 2012 02:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12721-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Oct 2012 02:46:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35329 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TRwPf-0004Zt-QJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 22:46:16 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:8615) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TRwPc-0004Zl-3Z for 12721-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 22:46:12 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu0/O+LFW/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIWAQVWIxALNBIUGA2IRboJjSaDHgOjM4FYgwU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="202958321" Original-Received: from 206-248-177-86.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.177.86]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 26 Oct 2012 22:43:58 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 6D9D25940A; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 22:43:58 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Fri, 26 Oct 2012 21:14:52 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:66096 Archived-At: > `featurep' typically indicates if a particular file has been loaded, > whereas `package-installed-p' indicates whether the package is available > (e.g. can be loaded). > Should it be `package-available-p'? It's probably not worse, but I don't see why it would be better. Stefan