From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#4789: use bootstrap-emacs to build emacs/leim directory, load emacs/leim/leim-list.el to loadup.el Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:57:56 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200911061649.nA6GnhUq027369@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> <55y6026rpt.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <79pql88pwu.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <7iobr1s76d.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83iph98hv8.fsf@gnu.org> <83ehrx8fxp.fsf@gnu.org> <83vcl87rxc.fsf@gnu.org> <83fwcc6qrj.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334062700 26677 80.91.229.3 (10 Apr 2012 12:58:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:58:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 4789@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 10 14:58:19 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SHaeF-0000z8-TF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:58:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49338 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHaeC-0008JN-Vj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:58:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55577) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHae9-0008J7-F8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:58:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHae1-0007iN-Om for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:58:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51673) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHae1-0007iJ-L3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:58:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHaf0-0007rk-6v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:59:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 4789 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 4789-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B4789.133406274030227 (code B ref 4789); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 4789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Apr 2012 12:59:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48211 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHaey-0007rU-Hr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:59:00 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.143.162]:48555) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHaex-0007rO-7F for 4789@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:58:59 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApYIACxOgk9sr+pC/2dsb2JhbABDuCMDgQyBCIIJAQEEAVYjEAs0BwsUGA0kiBwFtjKLYYR5BKRFgV2DAw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,391,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="173073817" Original-Received: from 108-175-234-66.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([108.175.234.66]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 10 Apr 2012 08:57:57 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id CA5E2589AF; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:57:56 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83fwcc6qrj.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:32:32 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:58690 Archived-At: >> > compile all the *.el files under leim/ as well, but Stefan once told >> > me something that I interpreted to mean he would rather go in the >> > opposite direction -- let the build process compile all the *.el files >> > under lisp/ and ship them uncompiled in the tarball. >> > Maybe I misunderstood. >> What I said/meant was that we should reduce the difference between >> "build from tarball" and "build from Bzr checkout". So, yes, I'd rather >> we don't distribute the .elc files in the tarball. But it's a low >> priority goal. > Does it mean you will be against distributing Leim packages in > byte-compiled form? I'm OK with it if it simplifies the code (by re-using the code used for the `lisp' directory), but otherwise I'm generally not in favor, indeed. Stefan