From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11095: [PATCH] Re: bug#11095: 24.0.94; hi-lock-face-buffer/unhighlight-regexp': Augment? Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 22:46:23 -0500 Message-ID: References: <81d37z271c.fsf@gmail.com> <87626i2i4r.fsf@gmail.com> <61B14D03B48D4D9E998771D3B7E4252C@us.oracle.com> <82F792DC51D24C39AEBFEE9BC6CBE335@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1354679225 30931 80.91.229.3 (5 Dec 2012 03:47:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 03:47:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11095@debbugs.gnu.org, 'Jambunathan K' To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 05 04:47:17 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tg5x3-0007un-CE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 04:47:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60134 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tg5wr-0004n6-IZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 22:47:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35569) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tg5wn-0004mf-T0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 22:46:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tg5wm-0000hZ-VE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 22:46:57 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43693) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tg5wm-0000hV-Rf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 22:46:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tg5wr-0006r2-J5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 22:47:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 03:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11095 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 11095-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11095.135467919426310 (code B ref 11095); Wed, 05 Dec 2012 03:47:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11095) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Dec 2012 03:46:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53944 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tg5wQ-0006qJ-3H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 22:46:34 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:56734) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tg5wO-0006qD-Pm for 11095@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 22:46:33 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai0FAG6Zu09soXOY/2dsb2JhbABEsEiDSYEIghUBAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDSSIHAW6CYVlil8DiEKacYFYgwc X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="209102758" Original-Received: from 108-161-115-152.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([108.161.115.152]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 04 Dec 2012 22:46:27 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id CBD8958C73; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 22:46:23 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <82F792DC51D24C39AEBFEE9BC6CBE335@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:43:53 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:67944 Archived-At: >> I think the real issue here is that hi-lock should have a customizable >> set of faces rather than a set of customizable faces. >> So if the user doesn't like hi-yellow (which should be called >> hi-lock-yellow, BTW) because she never highlights in yellow, she can >> replace it with her own face with the name she likes. > Ah, in that case you are really talking, I think, about having one or > more user options, which each has a face (or a set of faces) as value. Just one option `hi-lock-faces'. > Just why would you prefer a "customizable set of faces" over a "set of > customizable faces"? And how does that relate to the names? Because the user can then choose the names that make sense to her. Stefan